Simple economics/business question

  • Thread starter Thread starter imiyakawa
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating a proposed $10,000 investment that will yield $15,000 after one year, considering the firm's current cash flow issues and a 20% interest rate on loans. Participants suggest that the decision hinges on a net present value (NPV) analysis, comparing the investment's return to the potential interest earned if the money were kept in savings. The consensus is that if the investment generates a higher return than the cost of borrowing, it should be pursued. There is also concern about the assignment's weight, questioning the justification for a single-step question being worth five marks. Ultimately, the focus remains on determining whether the investment is financially viable despite existing cash flow challenges.
imiyakawa
Messages
262
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



You are employed by a business to evaluate a proposed 1-year investment project that will cost $10,000 today, but generate for your firm certain earnings of $15,000 at the end of the year. The investment is thought to be virtually risk-free, but others in your firm are concerned about a possible worsening of cash flow problems that the firm is already experiencing. The problem with cash flows is hitting the firm hard, and with the firm's bank currently charging 20 percent on one-year loans.

Should the firm undertake the investment project? Justify your decision.


2. The attempt at a solution

I really have no idea! It looks like an NPV question, but I really have no idea..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another way to look at this question would be to ask yourself: Which would be a better use of $10,000. Collection a 20% return in interest, or $5,000 profit from investment
 
JonF said:
Another way to look at this question would be to ask yourself: Which would be a better use of $10,000. Collection a 20% return in interest, or $5,000 profit from investment

Oh.. so the 20% interest can be seen as something you can gain if you don't undertake the transaction!

That would make it an NPV calculation?
 
Well kind of, but you don't need to use any fancy formulas to assess if it's a net gain since you just need your NPV to be positive.

Just ask which is bigger. $15,000 or 120% of $10,000.
 
Last edited:
JonF said:
Well kind of, but you don't need to use any fancy formulas to assess if it's a net gain since you just need your NPV to be positive.

Just ask which is bigger. $15,000 or 120% of $10,000.

yes, great point. Thanks!

This is a question on my assignment, and it's worth "5 marks". It is very concerning that a 1-step question would be worth 5 marks? Hmm. Maybe i'll do it your way & the NPV formula way just to scrape marks incase they have some lame marking criteria. I'll also try to invent some assumptions that the question is vague on.. :s
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top