Simple energy/kinematics problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxbashi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the horizontal distance a person lands after sliding down a 4.0 m water slide that ends 1.5 m above the pool surface. The correct approach uses conservation of mechanical energy and kinematics to find the initial velocity at the bottom of the slide. The book states the landing distance is 4.9 m, while the poster initially calculated 3.9 m. Clarification was needed on whether the 4.0 m measurement referred to the height from the slide to the pool or the bottom of the slide. The poster ultimately resolved their confusion independently.
maxbashi
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm not seeing my mistake, but I'm not getting the answer in the back of the book.

Homework Statement


A water slide has a height of 4.0 m. The people coming down the slide shoot out horizontally at the bottom, which is a distance of 1.5 m above the surface of the water in the pool. If a person starts down the slide from rest, neglecting frictional losses, how far from a point directly below the bottom of the slide does the person land?

Homework Equations


Just conservation of mechanical energy, and kinematics.

The Attempt at a Solution


The book gives 4.9 m, but here is my work where I get 3.9 m. I almost hate to ask what I'm doing wrong...
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    24.1 KB · Views: 786
Physics news on Phys.org
Recheck your calculation for the initial velocity. What's the change in height from the top of the slide to the bottom of the slide?
 
Oh - would the 4.0 m be the distance from the top of the water slide to the pool, or the distance from the top of the water slide to the bottom?

(Ok just answered my own question - thanks)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top