Simple Energy Levels confusion

alexgmcm
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
In the famous diagrams of the energy levels of a hydrogen atom it seems that the energy levels get closer together as they increase such that the difference in energy between higher energy levels is less than between lower ones. But working from the electron in a box approach we get the equation:

E_{n} = \left(\frac{h^2}{8mL^2} \right) n^2
where n = 1,2,3...

So that would suggest that the energy levels would go E, 4E, 9E, 16E etc. which would mean that the gaps between the energy levels would increase? But that's different to most of the diagrams I've seen like http://www.avogadro.co.uk/light/bohr/atomspec.gif" which seem to show the energy levels getting closer together.

I found http://imgur.com/OYSV4.png" in my textbook which also suggests that the energy levels should get further apart not closer together. I know that is only considering rotational and not vibrational energies, but the vibrational energies are equally spaced and so would not lead to closer energy levels in combination.

I'm sure I've just missed something quite basic here which is so basic the books fail to mention what it is, so can someone please help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential for a hydrogen atom is different than the potential for particle in a box. Different potentials give you different energy levels.
 
So in general for atoms and molecules, do the energy levels get closer together as you move farther apart from the atom. That is, do the differences in energy between the energy levels decrease at higher energy levels?
 
alexgmcm said:
So in general for atoms and molecules, do the energy levels get closer together as you move farther apart from the atom. That is, do the differences in energy between the energy levels decrease at higher energy levels?
Yup. You can perform a preliminary derivation of the relation between the energy levels and 'n' using Bohr's semiclassical model. That should be available in any standard text. For the hydrogen atom, the relation is
E_{n} = - \frac{13.6}{n^{2}} eV
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top