Simple energy question, but getting different results with different methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter defetey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the spring constant of a linear elastic spring using two different methods. The first method, based on static equilibrium, yields a spring constant of 70 N/m, while the second method, which equates gravitational potential energy to elastic potential energy, results in 140 N/m. The discrepancy arises because the second method does not account for the dynamic behavior of the system when the mass is released, leading to oscillations rather than immediate static equilibrium. The explanation emphasizes that the mass will fall and oscillate rather than settle instantly, clarifying why the two methods produce different results. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately applying energy conservation in spring-mass systems.
defetey
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A linear elastic spring is 0.15m long. When the upper end is held in the hand and a 0.5kg mass is suspended from the lower end, its length becomes 0.22m. What is the spring constant?

Homework Equations



E_{E}=\frac{1}{2}kx^{2}

\vec{F_{spring}}=kx

\vec{F_{G}}=mg

E_{G}=mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



First method:

Since the block is at rest, \vec{F}_{net}=0

\vec{F}_{G}-\vec{F}_{spring}=0

(0.5)(9.8)=k(0.07)

k=70N/mSecond method:

If we set the gravitational reference to where the block stops, it will be 0.07m up originally (with no elastic energy since it is not stretching the spring yet). Then when it is at the bottom, it will be 0, and so all that energy will be elastic energy.

E_{G}=E_{E}

(0.5)(9.8)(0.07)=\frac{1}{2}k(0.07)^{2}

k=140N/m

I know the first method is right, because with k=70N/m, \vec{F}=kx will be =4.9N, which is must be to cancel out the gravitational force and have it at rest. But shouldn't the second method also yield the same answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
defetey said:
First method:

Since the block is at rest, \vec{F}_{net}=0

\vec{F}_{G}-\vec{F}_{spring}=0

(0.5)(9.8)=k(0.07)

k=70N/m
Your first method looks good to me! :approve:
Second method:

If we set the gravitational reference to where the block stops, it will be 0.07m up originally (with no elastic energy since it is not stretching the spring yet). Then when it is at the bottom, it will be 0, and so all that energy will be elastic energy.
[...]
But shouldn't the second method also yield the same answer?
No. Ask yourself what would happen if you attached a weight to a spring, attached one side of a spring to your left hand (and you hold your left hand completely still from this point forward), and held the mass in your right hand such that the spring remains completely unstretched. Then release the mass. What happens?

Does the mass fall to an immediate state of static equilibrium and stay there?

It certainly does not! Instead it falls some distance (twice as much as the distance you used above), and then rises back up to where it was initially released, and this whole process repeats. You've created simple harmonic motion. The oscillation will continue indefinitely; well, at least until friction causes the oscillations to fade away, or until some other external force comes into play and stops the oscillations (and either situation involves work and energy).
 
Thanks collinsmark, this one had me confused! :approve:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top