Simple energy question, but getting different results with different methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter defetey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the spring constant of a linear elastic spring with a length of 0.15m, which extends to 0.22m when a 0.5kg mass is suspended from it. Two methods were employed to derive the spring constant, yielding results of 70 N/m and 140 N/m, respectively. The first method, based on static equilibrium, is confirmed as correct, while the second method introduces concepts of gravitational potential energy and elastic energy, leading to confusion regarding the results. The key takeaway is that the first method accurately reflects the static condition of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Knowledge of gravitational force calculations (F = mg)
  • Familiarity with energy conservation principles (E_G = E_E)
  • Basic concepts of static equilibrium in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Hooke's Law in various contexts
  • Explore energy conservation in mechanical systems, focusing on potential and elastic energy
  • Learn about simple harmonic motion and its relationship with spring systems
  • Investigate the effects of damping forces on oscillatory motion in springs
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and energy conservation, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to spring constants and oscillatory motion.

defetey
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A linear elastic spring is [tex]0.15m[/tex] long. When the upper end is held in the hand and a [tex]0.5kg[/tex] mass is suspended from the lower end, its length becomes [tex]0.22m[/tex]. What is the spring constant?

Homework Equations



[tex]E_{E}=\frac{1}{2}kx^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{F_{spring}}=kx[/tex]

[tex]\vec{F_{G}}=mg[/tex]

[tex]E_{G}=mgh[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



First method:

Since the block is at rest, [tex]\vec{F}_{net}=0[/tex]

[tex]\vec{F}_{G}-\vec{F}_{spring}=0[/tex]

[tex](0.5)(9.8)=k(0.07)[/tex]

[tex]k=70N/m[/tex]Second method:

If we set the gravitational reference to where the block stops, it will be [tex]0.07m[/tex] up originally (with no elastic energy since it is not stretching the spring yet). Then when it is at the bottom, it will be [tex]0[/tex], and so all that energy will be elastic energy.

[tex]E_{G}=E_{E}[/tex]

[tex](0.5)(9.8)(0.07)=\frac{1}{2}k(0.07)^{2}[/tex]

[tex]k=140N/m[/tex]

I know the first method is right, because with [tex]k=70N/m[/tex], [tex]\vec{F}=kx[/tex] will be [tex]=4.9N[/tex], which is must be to cancel out the gravitational force and have it at rest. But shouldn't the second method also yield the same answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
defetey said:
First method:

Since the block is at rest, [tex]\vec{F}_{net}=0[/tex]

[tex]\vec{F}_{G}-\vec{F}_{spring}=0[/tex]

[tex](0.5)(9.8)=k(0.07)[/tex]

[tex]k=70N/m[/tex]
Your first method looks good to me! :approve:
Second method:

If we set the gravitational reference to where the block stops, it will be [tex]0.07m[/tex] up originally (with no elastic energy since it is not stretching the spring yet). Then when it is at the bottom, it will be [tex]0[/tex], and so all that energy will be elastic energy.
[...]
But shouldn't the second method also yield the same answer?
No. Ask yourself what would happen if you attached a weight to a spring, attached one side of a spring to your left hand (and you hold your left hand completely still from this point forward), and held the mass in your right hand such that the spring remains completely unstretched. Then release the mass. What happens?

Does the mass fall to an immediate state of static equilibrium and stay there?

It certainly does not! Instead it falls some distance (twice as much as the distance you used above), and then rises back up to where it was initially released, and this whole process repeats. You've created simple harmonic motion. The oscillation will continue indefinitely; well, at least until friction causes the oscillations to fade away, or until some other external force comes into play and stops the oscillations (and either situation involves work and energy).
 
Thanks collinsmark, this one had me confused! :approve:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K