Simple exponential multiplication (electron interfernce)

Moonspex
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Briefly, the question asks to prove how the interference of 2 electrons (travelling in opposite directions as 1-D waves) would affect the probability of finding each electron in free space. My issue has to do with the first step in the solution.


Homework Equations



\Psi_{1} = \Psi_{0} e^{jkx}
\Psi_{2} = \Psi_{0} e^{-jkx} (Note change in direction)

Hence the interference of these two functions will be given by their sum:
\Psi_{total} = \Psi_{0} e^{jkx} \Psi_{0} · e^{-jkx} (i)
\Psi_{total} = 2\Psi_{0} cos (kx) (ii)


The Attempt at a Solution



I just don't understand how to get (ii) from (i)... thanks for looking!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A correction (You put a multiplication sign instead of an addition one. I think that was your mistake):

\Psi_{total}=\Psi_0(e^{jkx}+e^{-jkx})
Use Euler's formula, and just see that the imaginary sine terms cancel, while the real cosine terms add up.

e^{i\theta}=\cos \theta + i\sin \theta
 
Ah I see! I tend to forget simple steps like that which involve such simple identities. Thanks!
(PS: That was a typo on my part)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top