Simple Fourier transformation calculation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the Fourier transform, specifically the expression ##\hat{p}(\omega)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} p(t)e^{-i\omega t}\mathrm{d}t##. The integral is evaluated under the condition that ##\gamma + i(\omega + \omega_0) \neq 0##, leading to the conclusion that the numerator approaches zero as t approaches infinity, provided that ##\gamma > 0##. This assumption is critical for the validity of the transformation, as it ensures convergence of the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their mathematical properties.
  • Familiarity with complex analysis, particularly integrals involving complex exponentials.
  • Knowledge of convergence criteria for improper integrals.
  • Basic understanding of damping factors in mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier transforms in signal processing.
  • Learn about convergence of integrals in complex analysis.
  • Explore the role of damping factors in Fourier analysis.
  • Investigate applications of Fourier transforms in physics and engineering.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, engineers, and students studying signal processing or complex analysis who seek to deepen their understanding of Fourier transformations and their applications.

schniefen
Messages
177
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Calculate the Fourier transform of ##p(t)=Ae^{-\gamma t}e^{-i\omega_0t}\Theta(t)##, where ##\Theta(t)## is the step function, i.e. ##1## for ##t\geq 0## and ##0## otherwise, and ##A##, ##\gamma## and ##\omega_0## are unspecified constants. Do not use the "known" formula. The answer given is ##A/(\gamma+i(\omega-\omega_0))##.
Relevant Equations
I guess the "known" formula alludes to the Laplace transform, which the Fourier transform reduces to, i.e. I use the notation ##\hat{p}(\omega)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} p(t)e^{-i\omega t}\mathrm{d}t## for the Fourier transform of ##p(t)##.
So,
##\hat{p}(\omega)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} p(t)e^{-i\omega t}\mathrm{d}t=A\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-t(\gamma+i(\omega+\omega_0))}=A\left[-\frac{e^{-t(\gamma+i(\omega+\omega_0))}}{\gamma+i(\omega+\omega_0)}\right]_0^\infty,##​
provided ##\gamma+ i(\omega+\omega_0)\neq 0## for the last equality. Now, considering the answer given, why does the numerator go to ##0## at ##\infty##? The minus sign in front of the exponent could also be absorbed by the constants and then one could argue the numerator diverges at ##\infty##, or?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's definitely being assumed that##\gamma > 0## here. This is pretty common - otherwise why would they bother putting the minus sign in the first place?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: schniefen

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K