Simple Harmonic Motion Lab Question: Investigating the Period-Mass Relationship

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonesy3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic Lab
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a lab investigating the period-mass relationship in simple harmonic motion using a spring-mass system. The participant collected data on various masses and their corresponding periods of oscillation but found discrepancies when comparing experimental results to theoretical predictions. Concerns were raised about the accuracy of the spring constant calculation and the use of units, specifically the need to convert grams to kilograms for proper SI unit application. Additionally, clarification was sought on how the displacement measurements were taken relative to the spring's equilibrium. The overall conclusion emphasizes the importance of correct unit usage and measurement methods to ensure accurate results in the experiment.
jonesy3
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A lab I'm assigned concerning simple harmonic motion uses a simple spring attached to a mass system...it asks me to "investigate the period-mass relationship. determine the period of oscillation of your system for several different masses. Verify that your data is consistent with the predicted period mass relationship "T=2pi sqrt of [(m+m(eff))/K] Construct a graph of (period)^2 vs mass. Justify your conclusions. Employ % difference calculations where appropriate.


Homework Equations


My data was
mass 50.95g, went down 2.1cm from equilibrium, period=3.22 sec
mass 70.95g, went down 2.8 cm from equil, period=3.8 sec
mass 100.95, went down 4.0 cm from equil, period=4.04 sec
mass 120.95g, went down 4.9cm from equil, period=4.9sec
mass 140.95g, went down 5.7cm from equil, period=5.7sec


The Attempt at a Solution



Using f=-kx, i found the avg spring constant to be 243.54. I need to find the period of oscillation for all of the masses using the equation above and compare that to the period of oscillation I got in the actual experiment. I tested it out... so T=2pi (square root[50.95/242.6])...gives me T^2=1.32 or T=1.14... this is no where near 3.22sec which was my actual experimental result. The lab says that you should be getting within 1% error...is my data just very inaccurate or am I doing something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jonesy3 said:

Homework Statement


A lab I'm assigned concerning simple harmonic motion uses a simple spring attached to a mass system...it asks me to "investigate the period-mass relationship. determine the period of oscillation of your system for several different masses. Verify that your data is consistent with the predicted period mass relationship "T=2pi sqrt of [(m+m(eff))/K] Construct a graph of (period)^2 vs mass. Justify your conclusions. Employ % difference calculations where appropriate.


Homework Equations


My data was
mass 50.95g, went down 2.1cm from equilibrium, period=3.22 sec
mass 70.95g, went down 2.8 cm from equil, period=3.8 sec
mass 100.95, went down 4.0 cm from equil, period=4.04 sec
mass 120.95g, went down 4.9cm from equil, period=4.9sec
mass 140.95g, went down 5.7cm from equil, period=5.7sec


The Attempt at a Solution



Using f=-kx, i found the avg spring constant to be 243.54. I need to find the period of oscillation for all of the masses using the equation above and compare that to the period of oscillation I got in the actual experiment. I tested it out... so T=2pi (square root[50.95/242.6])...gives me T^2=1.32 or T=1.14... this is no where near 3.22sec which was my actual experimental result. The lab says that you should be getting within 1% error...is my data just very inaccurate or am I doing something wrong?

What do you mean by went down x cm from equilibrium? Did you hang the mass and measured the new equilibrium point relative to the equilibrium of the unloaded spring, or did you measure the amplitude of the oscillation relative to the loaded equilibrium?
 
I'd have to say be careful with units. The value for spring constant you have obtained is certainly not Newtons per meter. In your calculation you've used grams instead of kilograms. I'd recommend sticking with SI units. Plus have you measured frequency or time period in your experiment?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top