Simple Harmonic Motion - Acceleration and Time Period

AI Thread Summary
In simple harmonic motion, increasing the mass of an object, such as a car's wing mirror, results in a decrease in acceleration for the same applied force. This change leads to a longer time period for oscillation, as the frequency decreases due to the relationship between mass and spring stiffness. The energy of the oscillation remains constant, meaning the maximum potential energy and amplitude stay the same, despite the increased mass. Consequently, the time taken for each oscillation increases, as indicated by the relationship t = sqrt(2) when mass is doubled. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing motion in systems governed by simple harmonic principles.
ProPM
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am a bit confused regarding the relation between the acceleration and time period in simple harmonic motion.

This questions asks what would be one change to the motion of a car's wing mirror in case the glass was switched for a heavier one. I don't understand for example, how would the period change. I can think that the same force will have to move a greater mass over the same distance but, wouldn't the amplitude decrease if the mass increases?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the oscillation is going to occur around the _equilibrium_ location
(more massive glass will have a lower equilibrium);
the oscillation Energy depends on Amplitude (squared, times ½k)
but the frequency depends on the spring "stiffness" compared to the inertia
(inside a square root). If you have the same Force, but a bigger mass, what can you tell about the acceleration at these turn-around points?
(that is where it spends most of its time, since its speed is slow there).
 
Sorry, I couldn't follow very well the beginning. But, for the same force with a bigger mass the acceleration will decrease.

So, from the equation, either omega must decrease (frequency decreases/time period increases) or the displacement will decrease...

How do I know which of these will happen?
 
IF the oscillation has the same (total) Energy, it has the same maximum PE (spring),
so it will have the same amplitude (maximum displacement from equilibrium).
. . . . if the mass is doubled . . .
acceleration will be halved, in x = ½at^2 , (here, t is roughly time for ¼ oscillation)
but it has to get just as far, so t^2 is doubled . . . so t is increased by sqrt(2)
that's why the omega formula is squareroot(k/m).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top