Simple Harmonic Motion and free-fall accelerations

AI Thread Summary
A seconds pendulum has a period of 2.000 seconds, with lengths of 0.9942 m in Cambridge and 0.9927 m in Tokyo. The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of free-fall accelerations at these two locations, expressed as g_C/g_T. By using the formula T = 2π√(L/g), the relationship between the lengths and accelerations can be established, leading to the conclusion that g_C/g_T equals the ratio of the pendulum lengths. The final result shows that g_C is approximately 1.00151 times greater than g_T.
imnotsmart
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
A "seconds" pendulum is one that goes through its equilibrium position once each second. (The period of the pendulum is 2.000 s.) The length of a seconds pendulum is 0.9927 m at Tokyo and 0.9942 m at Cambridge, England. What is the ratio of the free-fall accelerations at these two locations?
Cambridge / Tokyo) = 1 +?

How do I work this problem? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you observe, in Cambridge the value of g is higher than in Tokyo (g_C/g_T = 1 + ?).

Knowing that the periods are equal, then:

\frac{T_C}{T_T} = 1

or


\frac{2\pi \sqrt{\frac{l_C}{g_C}}}{2\pi \sqrt{\frac{l_T}{g_T}}} = 1

You can go on to find g_C/g_T in terms of the ratio l_C/l_T.
 
Are you familiar with this formula?

T = 2\pi \sqrt\frac{L}{g}

T is the peroid, so set it equal to two and solve for the value g with your given L value.
 
theCandyman said:
Are you familiar with this formula?

T = 2\pi \sqrt\frac{L}{g}

T is the peroid, so set it equal to two and solve for the value g with your given L value.

It is neater to express the ratio of free fall accelerations in terms of the ratio of the 1-sec pendulum lengths, than finding the free fall acceleration in each location and then computing the ratio.

Indeed the conclusion will be that:

\frac{g_C}{g_T} = \frac{l_C}{l_T} = \frac{0.9942}{0.9927} = 1 + 1.51 * 10^{-3}
 
Yes, yours is a much better way to compute it. I dislike dealing with ratios throught out a whole problem so I attempted it a different way.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top