Simple harmonic motion - answer slightly off

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block and a bullet, focusing on the calculation of amplitude in simple harmonic motion (SHM) and the percentage of kinetic energy transferred. The user successfully calculated the percentage of kinetic energy transferred but found a discrepancy between their result (1.23%) and the book's answer (1.17%). They suspect that the book's answer may be incorrect due to early rounding in calculations. The consensus is that the book's answer is indeed wrong, highlighting the importance of maintaining precision in calculations until the final step. This reinforces the idea that rounding can significantly affect results in physics problems.
Lord Anoobis
Messages
131
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


A 4.00kg block is suspended from a spring with k = 500N/m. A 50.0g bullet is fired into the block from directly below with a speed of 125m/s and becomes embedded in the block.

a) Find the amplitude of the resulting SHM.
b) What percentage of the original kinetic energy of the bullet is transferred to mechanical energy of the oscillator?

Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum, ##p_f = p_i##
##K = \frac{1}{2}mv^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem is solved but there is something about the given answer or part (b) that is bugging me, so let's ignore (a). For (b) I arrived at

##percentage = 100(\frac{K_m}{K_b})##

##percentage = 100(\frac{m(v_b)^2}{(m + M)(v_m)^2})##

where ##K_b## is the initial kinetic energy of the bullet and ##K_m## is the kinetic energy of system after the bullet becomes embedded in the block. The velocity of the block in this state is given by

##v_m = \frac{m v_b}{m + M}##

The trouble is that the preferred method of working with symbols until the very end gives an answer of 1.23% whereas the book answer is 1.17%. However, I noticed that if you use ##v_m = 1.5m/s## the correct answer pops up.

I've noticed this sort of thing on a number of occasions where using a rounded figure in the final answer turns out to be more correct, so to speak, which goes against the usual method. Did I blow it somewhere or is it really a case of early rounding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Book answer is simply wrong -- due to too early rounding, as you indicate. Well spotted !
 
BvU said:
Book answer is simply wrong -- due to too early rounding, as you indicate. Well spotted !
Thanks a lot. Always good to know where the error lies.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top