Simple Harmonic Motion Brain Teaser

AI Thread Summary
A particle in simple harmonic motion has defined velocities at two displacements, x1 and x2. The equations for displacement and velocity in SHM are provided, but the challenge lies in expressing angular frequency (ω) and amplitude (A) in terms of these quantities. By substituting the known values into the SHM equations, a relationship between ω and A can be established. This can be done for both time instances, allowing for the elimination of time variables. Ultimately, the goal is to derive expressions for ω and A using the given velocities and displacements.
cj
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
I saw this in an old, junior-level, classical mechanics
textbook and haven't been able to figure it out.

A particle undergoing simple harmonic motion has a velocity:

\frac{dx_1}{dt}

when the displacement is:

x_1

and a velocity

\frac{dx_2}{dt}

when the displacement is:

x_2

What is the angular frequency and the amplitude of the motion in terms of the given quantities?

I know the solution to the SHM wave equation is:

\begin{equation}<br /> x(t) = A \cdot sin( \omega t + \phi )\end{equation}

And that:

\begin{equation}<br /> dx(t)/dt = A \omega \cdot cos( \omega t + \phi )\end{equation}

But can't see how to express omega or A in these terms.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If x = A.sin(w.t) then

x1 = A sin(w.t1)
x2 = A.sin(w.t2)
dx/dt 1= A.w.cos(w.t1)
dx/dt 2 = A.w.cos(w.t2)

I am not going to do it but there appears to be enough information , to eliminate t1,t2 and get A and w.
For instance a) and c) can eliminate t1 , b) and d) eliminate t2 .
 
Last edited:
cj said:
But can't see how to express omega or A in these terms.
Apply what you know. I'll get you started. You are given: At time t_1 the displacement is x_1 and the speed is v_1. (I didn't like your notation, so I changed it. :smile: )

So... just plug into your SHM equations:
x_1 = A sin(\omega t_1)
v_1 = A \omega cos(\omega t_1)
Combine these equations to get a relationship between \omega and A.

Now do the same for time t_2, and then you should be able to solve for \omega and A.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top