Simple Harmonic Motion- From Uniform Circular Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between angular frequency (W), frequency (f), and the period (T) in simple harmonic motion. The confusion arises from the different forms of the equations provided by the instructor and the textbook. It is clarified that W can be expressed as W = 2π√(k/m), where k is the spring constant and m is the mass, while T can be derived as T = 2π√(m/k). The distinction between measuring frequency in radians per second versus Hertz is also explained, noting that 1 Hz equals one cycle per second, which corresponds to 2π radians. Understanding these conversions helps clarify the equations and their applications in simple harmonic motion.
chantalprince
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I don't have a homework question exactly, but I need help with an equation please.


Angular frequency: W= 2 pi/T = 2(pi)(f) f= frequency

And- W = square root of (k/m) k = spring constant m= mass

So, wouldn't T = 2 pi / square root of (k/m) ??



My instructor has given us the following equations in class a few times. I cannot figure out what the heck is going on!

W = (2 pi) x the square root of(k/m)
T = (2 pi) x the square root of (m/k) -------> m/k this time

Any help is appreciated. I am so confused right now.





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is simply because of the fact that:

\frac{1}{\frac{a}{b}}=\frac{b}{a}
 
Ok- but in the book it gives: W = sq. root of (k/m)

Instructor gives: W = 2pi x sq. root (k/m)

Whats with the 2 pi??

Thanks-
 
What's the difference between measuring angular frequency in Hz and measuring frequency in radians per second? That might give you an idea where the conversion comes from.
 
Ok...I'll sit down with that thought. So, either one works right? They are the same thing??
 
Ah I see what you're getting at now. There's a mistake in the equation for frequency:

\omega_{n} = \sqrt{\frac {k}{m}} (1)

where frequency is in radians per second.

But what if you want to express the frequency in Hertz? Well, we know that 1 Hz is equal to one cycle per second. In the case of circular motion, one cycle is equal to 2\pi radians.

So to convert from radians per second to Hertz, one must divide by 2\pi. Hence:

\omega = \frac {1}{2\pi} \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}} (2)

where frequency is now in Hertz.

Now let's express this in terms of the period of one cycle, T. Bear in mind that if you were simply to reciprocate the expression for frequency when expressed in radians per second (equation 1), you would be stating the length of time of rotation for one radian alone. Hence you have to multiply the expression by 2\pi now to obtain the period for a single cycle. This is now the same equation as you would obtain by reciprocating equation 2.

Hope this helps.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top