Simple harmonic motion of a car

AI Thread Summary
A 1000 kg car with two 100 kg passengers experiences simple harmonic motion on a bumpy road, bouncing maximally at 5.0 m/s. After picking up three additional 100 kg passengers, the sag in the car's suspension is calculated to be 2.23 cm. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying formulas for mass and spring constant to determine the change in suspension length. Participants clarify the need to use the total mass after adding passengers to find the correct sag. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the application of physics principles in real-world scenarios.
danielle36
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
A 1000 kg car carrying two 100 kg football players travels over a bumpy "washboard" road with the bumps spaced 3.0 m apart. The driver finds that the car bounces with a max amplitude when he drives at a speed of 5.0 m/s. The car then stops and picks up three more 100 kg passengers. By how much does the car body sag on its suspension when these three additional passengers get in?

------------

\lambda = 3.0 m
f = v/ \lambda
f = 1.67 Hz
\omega = 2 \pi f = \sqrt{k/m}
k = 132300 N/m
\Delta L = mg/k
\Delta L = 0.11 m

-----

Answer is 2.23 cm

I think my basic problem here is I just don't know what I'm doing. :confused:

Thanks for taking the time to read :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you don't know what you are doing, then how did you get this far? Is this the way the answer tells you to do it? Or did the question hint at this and did you find it out yourself? Or did you put it together all by yourself?

As for the answer, I can say you are almost there. Just note that you are calculating the change in L in the last two lines, not L itself. This change is induced by the changing of another quantity, if you want the \Delta L you will also have to plug in the change in this quantity, and not the value itself. Or, alternatively, you can first calculate L for the case before and after, and subtract them to find the difference.
 
Ohhh I thought I was just way off... I had tried subtracting the change in L when m = 1000 kg, but I see now that I had to use m = 1200 kg and that gives me a 2.22 cm difference


Thank you :D
 
Great

danielle36 said:
I think my basic problem here is I just don't know what I'm doing. :confused:

Has that problem been solved too, or do you want someone to explain it?
 
Actually, I think I got it now.. What I was doing made sense to me but since I was so far off I thought I was applying the equations to the wrong situation, but it turns out I just hadn't thought the question over enough
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top