Simple Harmonic Motion with 2 beads

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the period of harmonic motion for two beads of different masses sliding in a spherical bowl. Participants suggest using Newton's second law and conservation of energy to analyze the motion, emphasizing that the mass cancels out, leading to the same angular frequency for both beads. The angle made by the radius with the vertical is crucial for deriving the equations of motion. The beads will have different amplitudes but will meet at the bottom of the bowl if released from equal heights. Overall, the approach involves understanding the forces acting on the beads and applying small-angle approximations.
heartofaragorn
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small bead of mass m1 slides without friction in a spherical bowl of radius R. The bead is displaced a height h1 from the bottom of the bowl. A second, more massive bead of mass m2 is displaced a height h2 from the bottom of the bowl opposite the first bead. The two beads are released at the same time.

Calculate the period of the harmonic motion, individually, for each of the beads as if they are placed alone in the bowl.

Identify the position where the two beads first meet.


Homework Equations


T = W / 2pi
x = A cos/sin (Wt + delta)


The Attempt at a Solution


My professor mentioned using the formula for the angular frequency of a mass spring system, that being the square root of k / m. However, I do not see its applicability at this point. I have no idea how to calculate the period with the information given...for instance, how am I to determine the angular velocity based upon what is given? I figured that was the place to start, but again, I don't see how the sq. root of k / m will help me since we're not dealing with a spring. As for the second part, my best guess is that I need to write position equations for each bead and set them equal to one another? Is that right?

Please help! :bugeye:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good place to start would be with conservation of energy.
 
You could also calculate the force acting on the bead along the tangent to the bowl. If \theta is the angle the radius from the center of the bowl to the bead makes with the horizontal, then the force parallel to the bowl is -mg cos(\theta). Setting that equal to ma will give you an analog to the spring problem. However, a spring, acting horizontally as is normally the case in "Simple Harmonic Motion" problems, does not involve gravity. This does and, as always in gravity problems, the mass cancels out- the two beads will accelerate at the same rate. If, for example, h1 and h2 were the same, the beads would collide at the bottom of the bowl.
 
Mindscrape said:
A good place to start would be with conservation of energy.

As far as I can see, conservation of energy is useless for this particular question. The beads won't have the same speed when they collide.

HallsofIvy gave the only way to proceed: using Newton's second law.
However, I woul duse the angle defined between a line going from the center of curvature of the bead and the verticla, in which case the force will be - m g sin \theta. Assuming small angles, the sin can be approximated by the angle itself. The next step is to write the acceleration as r \frac{d^2 \theta}{dt^2}. This way, one gets an equation which is similar to the one for a mass attached to a spring. One may then directly obtain (by analogy) the equation for the angle as function fo time \theta(t). As HallsofIvy pointed out, the mass will have canceled out in the equation and one finds out that the angular frequency \omega is the same for both beads. The only difference will be the angular amplitude of oscillation, \theta_{max}. These can be found using the initial heights and simple trigonometry.

But the fact thatteh two angular frequencies are the same should suggest something interesting that will happen!
 
I will definitely try the force approach. I can't believe I didn't think of it. I guess I just panicked when I saw the problem. Thanks for all of the input!
 
I suppose that short of a Legrangian conservation of energy isn't as helpful as force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top