Simple Inner Product Proof (complex)

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
I'm okay on proving the other properties, just struggling with what to do on this one:

(v,v)≥0, with equality iff v=0,where the inner product is defined as:


z1w*1+iz2w*2

(where * represent the complex conjugate)

My working so far is:
u1u*1+iu2u*2
=u1^2 + iu2^2


(I'm not sure what to do next and how to deal with the i algebriacally. I've done real ones and complex one without an i in the definition,and seem ok with this property for them).
Thanks alot, greatly appreaciated =].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi binbagsss! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
binbagsss said:
I'm okay on proving the other properties, just struggling with what to do on this one:

(v,v)≥0, with equality iff v=0,where the inner product is defined as:


z1w*1+iz2w*2

(where * represent the complex conjugate)


does (u,v) = (v,u)* ? :wink:
 
Your calculations are largely correct (you need modulus signs on u1 and u2 in your final expression).

Since \langle (u_1,u_2),(u_1,u_2)\rangle = |u_1|^2 +i|u_2|^2 is not necessarily real, the conclusion must be that \langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle as defined is not an inner product.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top