Simple Introductory Problem that's giving me troubles

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChaseRLewis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Introductory
ChaseRLewis
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1-3 A burst of 1014 electrons accelerated to an energy of 15MeV per electron is stopped in a copper target block of mass 100g. If the block is thermally insulated, what is its temperature rise? The specific heat of copper is 0.09 cal/g K

Homework Equations



m*Cp*dT = dQ

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume 100% of KE transfer to heat.
Negligible mass increase.

(100g)*(.09 cal/g K) dT = 1014 electrons * 15 MeV/electron * 2.6144*10^(-13) cal/MeV

The solution is supposed to be 6.3 K but what I have above isn't even remotely close (way too small). I'm trying to guide myself through a special relativity book and given this is was the only problem in the beginning I couldn't get to matchup I feel a bit awkward posting it because it seems so simple : /.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably a typo? If you take the number of electrons as 1014 and divide by 2.6.. instead of multiplying (you did a calculation mistake, it seems), the answer comes out to be ~6.3 K.
 
Sourabh N said:
Probably a typo? If you take the number of electrons as 1014 and divide by 2.6.. instead of multiplying (you did a calculation mistake, it seems), the answer comes out to be ~6.3 K.

Ah thanks it was the 10^14 rather than 1014 : / got to get used to these ebook prints.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top