Simple kirchhoff 2nd rule problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter PainterGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kirchhoff
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the application of Kirchhoff's second rule regarding potential changes in a circuit. A user questions why the potential change is considered negative when moving from point b to H, despite H being near the positive terminal of a 5V power supply. Responses clarify that the potential difference depends on the direction of traversal and the context of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL). It is explained that when applying KVL, the potential changes across resistors are taken as negative when moving against the current. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the reference direction and the effects of resistors and power sources in circuit analysis.
PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
72
hi everyone,


please i need urgent help. in the attached image if R=1 ohm is traverse from b to H, why is potential change taken as -ive. the point H is close to +ive terminal of 5V power supply so it could also be a positive potential when traversing from b to H? please help me. hope you understand my question. in other words why is potential change taken as -(1A x 1Ohm) instead of +(1A x 1Ohm) when traversing from b to H - H being close to positive terminal of 5V power supply?

and same could be said when traversing from H to b, i think then potential change would taken as positive, why?

thanks. please help me quickly
 

Attachments

  • kirchhoff rule.jpg
    kirchhoff rule.jpg
    36.6 KB · Views: 560
Physics news on Phys.org
hi painterguy! :smile:

(have an ohm: Ω and there's usually no "i" in "+ve" :wink:)

i don't really understand what you're trying to do :confused:

if you're applying KVL to the top loop, clockwise, then IR for both resistors will be +ve, though the V for one battery will be +ve, and one will be -ve

(and both batteries are "pushing" the same way, so one has to lose, doesn't it? :wink:)
 
hello tiny-tim,

big thanks for helping me out. i didn't know where to find ohm symbol so used the word "ohm" in its place. and next time wonl't include "i" in +ve. so much addicted to texting that finding it hard to put the habit away while using this cool forums.

it sounds you wanted to tell me potential change wud be -ve for both resistors. please let know me.

cheers
 
painterguy said:
hello tiny-tim,

big thanks for helping me out. i didn't know where to find ohm symbol so used the word "ohm" in its place. and next time wonl't include "i" in +ve. so much addicted to texting that finding it hard to put the habit away while using this cool forums.

it sounds you wanted to tell me potential change wud be -ve for both resistors. please let know me.

cheers

hello painterguy! :smile:

(on a mac, you can just type alt-z for Ω :wink:)

it depends whether you measure it from a to b or from b to a

the potential difference clockwise around the outside loop is 6 V across each resistor, equalling the 12 V emf

but the potential difference clockwise around the lower loop is 6 V across the lowest resistor, and minus 1 V across the middle resistor, equalling the 5 V emf :wink:
 
tiny-tim thanks for this help. i still struggling with these concepts. will come back if hit a stone again. much thanks.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top