Simple Laws of motion question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the launch speed and peak height of a 550-gram object launched vertically for approximately 4.5 seconds. The user initially estimated the peak height to be around 36.79 meters and the launch speed at 49.5 miles per hour based on their understanding of gravitational acceleration. However, a more experienced participant corrected these calculations, stating that the initial velocity should be around 22 m/s (11.4 mph) and the maximum height approximately 24.8 meters. The importance of using correct formulas for motion under gravity was emphasized, highlighting the need for clarity in physics concepts. Accurate calculations are crucial for reliable results in physics experiments.
faamfwvame
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A friend and I were conducting a science experiment, where an object weighing roughly 550 grams was launched vertically, and after examining the video footage, was airborne for aproximatly 4.5 secconds. Having never studied physics before, I was curious if you could calculate the launch speed and or peak height from this information.

Any help would be highly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming negligible air resistence, which is approximatelytrue if the object is a ball made of a dense material, the velocity of a body moving against gravity is v = v_0 - gt
At the top of the trajectory the velocity is 0 and the time is half the total time.
 
I don't really understand that sorry, but according to Wikipedia, a stationary object's speed increases by 9.81 metres per second as it falls. and since my object was falling for 4.5/2, 2.25 secconds, I figured the peak hieght would be 9.81 + (9.81x2) + (9.81x3)/4 which equals 36.7875 metres, which, having seen the object, sounds about right. And 9.81 being approximatly 22 miles per hour, I guessed the speed it was traveling when it hit the ground and indeed the speed it was launched at would be 22 x 2.25 which is 49.5 miles per hour.
However, having no expirience with physics, I am hesitant to trust these results. Could anyone confirm or correct this?
Thank you for your input.
 
faamfwvame said:
I don't really understand that sorry, but according to Wikipedia, a stationary object's speed increases by 9.81 metres per second as it falls. and since my object was falling for 4.5/2, 2.25 secconds, I figured the peak hieght would be 9.81 + (9.81x2) + (9.81x3)/4 which equals 36.7875 metres, which, having seen the object, sounds about right. And 9.81 being approximatly 22 miles per hour, I guessed the speed it was traveling when it hit the ground and indeed the speed it was launched at would be 22 x 2.25 which is 49.5 miles per hour.
However, having no expirience with physics, I am hesitant to trust these results. Could anyone confirm or correct this?
Thank you for your input.
I don't understand the calculations you made. The initial and final velocities are equal in absolute values.
v_0 = 9.81*2.25 = 22m/s = 11.4 mph
The maximum heogth will be
h = v_0*t - \frac{1}{2]g*t^2 = 24.8m
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top