Negative Angular Velocity: Is It a Change in Direction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotaPhysicsMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Urgent
AI Thread Summary
Negative angular velocity indicates movement in the opposite direction rather than a complete stop before changing direction. The calculations provided show that transitioning from a positive to a negative angular velocity does not imply a halt in motion but rather a shift in rotational direction. Angular acceleration measures the rate of change of angular velocity but does not directly indicate a change in direction. The confusion may arise from the different scales used for measuring angles, but this does not affect the sign of angular velocity. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between angular velocity, direction, and acceleration.
NotaPhysicsMan
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Ok,

If my angular velocity is negative, does that mean I've stopped and now changing directions in terms of my movement?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular velocity is rate of change of angle about a fixed point, so if it's negative it means you're now moving around the point in the opposite direction.
 
Ok, so let's say my calculation came to:

120 degrees=+2.02 rad/s
150 degrees=-0.60 rad/s

Does this mean that in between this point, I stopped my movement in the positive and now am traveling in the opposing direction? So angular acceleartion doesn't really tell me if it has changed direction. Just tells me if it's slowing down or increasing.
 
150 degrees should give more radians than 120 degrees. It's just measured on a different scale so that shouldn't cause it to become negative.

Try using google if the conversion isn't working out too well.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top