Simple pendulum, and inertial and gravitational mass

Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
Sir,
A simple pendulum has a length L. The inertial and gravitational masses of the bob are m1 and m2 respectively. Then the time period of the simple pendulum is given by
T = 2(pie)[m1L/m2g]^(1/2) {Read as 2 pie root m one L by m two g)
My question is that the ratio of inertial mass to gravitational mass is one, so why does m1 and m2 appear in the expression? Also, why do we put m1 in the numerator and m2 in the denominator? What I mean is that why couldn’t it have been in the following way,
T = 2(pie)[m2L/m1g]^(1/2)
Here the g is acceleration due to gravity and pie = 3.14 and the symbol ^ represents power.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, simply because m_{1} appears in the second law of Newtonian dynamics F=m_{1}a, while m_{2} appears in the universal attraction law F=-G m_{2}M/r^{2}...

Daniel.

Eötvös proved experimentally the equality between the 2 and Einstein used this to formulate the Principle of Equivalence in GR.
 
"Theoretical physics is a science locally isomorphic to mathematics"

"mathematics is the language of theoretical physics :-)"
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top