Can an Object Have Negative Position and Positive Velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter star223
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An object can have a negative position while maintaining a positive velocity, as demonstrated by the example of an object starting at a negative position and moving rightward. The mathematical expression for velocity, v = (x1 - x0)/t, confirms that if an object moves from a negative position to a less negative position over time, its velocity can be positive. The discussion also highlights the importance of understanding relative positions, as demonstrated by a car's position relative to a mile marker. Additionally, when calculating the velocity of a stunt car on a moving train, one must consider both the train's velocity and the car's velocity, adding them together if the car moves toward the front of the train. Overall, the concepts of position and velocity are crucial in understanding motion in physics.
star223
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
ok I am in 9th grade and I am taking honors physics. were not very far into it, juss like simple motion u kno? I've tried to take in a lot at once recently bc I've been sick, so i went and read ch. 3-5 in my book...well there's sections i can't find again and stuff and i need help with the following problem:
Show mathematically that an object can have a negative position but a positive velocity.
I had this idea that it can go to like the left at 45 m/s or something...but I am not sure :P help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
omg there's like 3 more too...IM SOOOO CONFUSED! :cry:
 
First draw a picture. Show the position axis with the origin. Mark a spot where the object can be for it to have a negative position. Now use an arrow to represent the velocity vector. How must this arrow point for the velocity to be positive ?

In the future, post this in the Homework Help section.

(would someone move this ?)
 
oh like to the right it just has to start froma negative position rite?
 
position = original position + velocity * time

There's no reason that position or original position can't be negative. They're not under a squre root symbol. Given enough time, position will cross 0 and become positive. And position is just a relative thing anyway. A car traveling east and is 1 mile west of mile marker 2 could be said to have a position of -1 mile relative to mile marker 2, or +1 mile relative to mile marker 0.

But I don't know how to express that mathematically.
 
im not sure if it means an equation or a graph or what...omg I am gona get an F :(
 
star223 said:
oh like to the right it just has to start froma negative position rite?

That's right.

Consider x(t=0s) = -10m (this is a negative position)
and x(t=1s) = -5m (also negative)

The v = (x1-x0)/t = ?
 
Okay wait.. v=(x1-xo)/t =?
v=(-10+5)/1s ?
v=-5m/s? is that rite?
 
YES! I GOT IT!...okay it juss kinda clicked lol...but i have a small question...okay here's the problem:
A stunt car is driven along a flat train car. The stunt car is moving toward the engine of the trani. how would you calculate the velocity of the stunt car relative to Earth?
I put. . .'You would find the velocity of the ____ then the velocity of the stunt car. Then subtract using V2-V1...' Do i find the velocity of the train? And if it is the train, then is that V2?
 
  • #10
star223 said:
YES! I GOT IT!...okay it juss kinda clicked lol...but i have a small question...okay here's the problem:
A stunt car is driven along a flat train car. The stunt car is moving toward the engine of the trani. how would you calculate the velocity of the stunt car relative to Earth?
I put. . .'You would find the velocity of the ____ then the velocity of the stunt car. Then subtract using V2-V1...' Do i find the velocity of the train? And if it is the train, then is that V2?
Some trains have more than one engine. Assuming that it meant that the car is moving towards the front of the train, you would add the train's velocity to the car's velocity.
 
Back
Top