Simple problem with vectors in 3 dimensions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving three cables tied to a balloon and determining the vertical force component at point A. The initial approach calculated the vertical force from cable AB as 207.2 N and multiplied it by three, resulting in 621.6 N. However, the teacher's method involved finding the x and z components to ensure equilibrium, leading to a different y resultant. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding force vectors and equilibrium in static systems, clarifying that the graphical representation of distances does not equate to the forces involved. Ultimately, the participants conclude that the assumption of equilibrium is valid for this scenario.
Wolftacular
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three cables are used to tie the balloon shown in the figure. Determine the vertical component of the force P exerted over the balloon at point A, if the tension on cable AB is 259 N.

http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/9687/physicsballoonproblem.png

(Sorry for the figure. I had to re-draw it myself, on paint, with a touch pad. Assume all measurements are parallel to the axises, of course)

Homework Equations


Pythagorean theorem.

The Attempt at a Solution


Figured out the resulting distance of AB with Pythagorean theorem and then used cross multiplying to find out the equivalent vertical component of AB. Then...

What I did: Simply multiplied that resulting vertical force (207.2 N) times three for each of the cables, for a vertical resultant of 621.6 N.

What the teacher did: He also found the x component of AB and equaled it to the x component of CA, found the z component and equaled it to that of AD. Then, with lots of triangle solving, found the three different y components and added them all up for a result of 1000-something N.

MY QUESTION:
How would you go about solving this problem? The teacher reasoned that the x and z components had to be in equilibrium to find the y resultant. I disagree because he never stated that the balloon was in equilibrium anywhere. Is he wrong? Or should I always assume that, when finding a component, all other components should be balanced?

This is a test question and he's very stubborn so I want to know what you all think.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
"Tie the balloon" implies that the cable and the balloon are stationary - or at least can become stationary if released. And when the system is stationary, it is in equilibrium.

You could also consider that, geometrically, three cables can meet, when fully extended, at two points at most (can you see why?), so it has to be stationary at one of those points.
 
Wolftacular said:

What I did: Simply multiplied that resulting vertical force (207.2 N) times three for each of the cables, for a vertical resultant of 621.6 N.


Uh ... you really need to think that through. How can you possibly justify that? Perhaps thinking about that will help you see what actually has to be done.
 
So I suppose my mistake (as well as the rest of my classmates') was to assume that the graphical vector representation of the distances (on the picture) was identical to that of the forces, when in reality, it's not. Hence why the vertical distances might be the same but not the tension in these three vertical components. Right?
 
Wolftacular said:
So I suppose my mistake (as well as the rest of my classmates') was to assume that the graphical vector representation of the distances (on the picture) was identical to that of the forces, when in reality, it's not. Hence why the vertical distances might be the same but not the tension in these three vertical components. Right?

Well think about it this way: If you push a box in a North West direction, is all of the force you expend going towards moving the box in the Northernly direction?

Do you understand how to use force vectors?
 
phinds said:
Well think about it this way: If you push a box in a North West direction, is all of the force you expend going towards moving the box in the Northernly direction?

Do you understand how to use force vectors?

Yes I do, and if I'm to take your example as the basis of what you think my mistake really was, I think you're confused. Either way, my doubts have been cleared, so thank you! :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top