Simple question regarding weight flow rate and specific gravity

AI Thread Summary
Specific gravity is used in hydraulics problems to relate the density of a fluid to the density of water, which is essential for calculating weight flow rates. The unit weight of water (9810 N/m³) is multiplied by the specific gravity to determine the unit weight of the fluid in question. This approach allows for the conversion of volume flow rates into weight flow rates, which is often required in problems. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how to adapt formulas when specific values are not provided. Overall, clarity on these concepts is crucial for solving future hydraulics problems effectively.
drdyke
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A 100 mm diameter plunger is being pushed at 60 mm/sec into a tank filled with oil having sp.gr. of 0.82. If the fluid is incompressible, how many N/s of oil is being forced out a 30-mm diameter hole?
Relevant Equations
weight flow rate = unit weight x Q

Q1 = Q2
i’m studying my textbook in hydraulics and i’d like to know the reason why specific gravity is used in one of the problems. it’s a pretty simple problem and i understood it mostly except why specific gravity is multiplied to 9810 (the unit weight of water). if the SG is given in the problem, is it always multiplied to the unit weight?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 9D16A092-0839-4E2E-A6EA-CC113B2A5A55.jpeg
    9D16A092-0839-4E2E-A6EA-CC113B2A5A55.jpeg
    57.9 KB · Views: 134
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you looked up what "specific gravity" means?

Ideally you would do that in the textbook, but failing that google will probably have the answer.
 
pasmith said:
Have you looked up what "specific gravity" means?

Ideally you would do that in the textbook, but failing that google will probably have the answer.
i do know that specific gravity is the ratio of density of fluid over density of water. what i am confused tho is why it is multiplied to the unit weight 9810 when it isn’t stated in the formula? i just want that part cleared up so i won’t be confused on future problems anymore

thanks
 
drdyke said:
when it isn’t stated in the formula?
What formula?

(I have to say, Newtons is a peculiar way to express a quantity of oil being exuded. Far more reasonable to express it as a mass.)
 
drdyke said:
i do know that specific gravity is the ratio of density of fluid over density of water. what i am confused tho is why it is multiplied to the unit weight 9810 when it isn’t stated in the formula? i just want that part cleared up so i won’t be confused on future problems anymore

thanks

Ideally your textbook should tell you what value to use if the question does not explicitly state a value. Remember that density depends on pressure and temperature, neither of which are given in the question.
 
haruspex said:
What formula?

(I have to say, Newtons is a peculiar way to express a quantity of oil being exuded. Far more reasonable to express it as a mass.)
weight flow rate = unit weight x Q

here the process became

weight flow rate = unit weight (SG) x Q
 
drdyke said:
what i am confused tho is why it is multiplied to the unit weight 9810 when it isn’t stated in the formula? i just want that part cleared up so i won’t be confused on future problems anymore
You are expected to be able to adapt a formula if necessary. Don’t expect a different formula for every possible slightly different variation of a problem.

The question asks for the flow-rate in N/s, so you know that you are being asked to calculate the weight of oil coming out per second. (As already noted, this is a rather unusual way to express flow-rate.)

You should be given the nominal value for the density of water (1000kg/m³) and for the acceleration due to gravity (9.81m/s² = 9.81 N/kg). You are expected to sort out for yourself that:

a) the density of water can be expressed as 1000*9.81 = 9810 N/m³

b) the density of oil can be expressed as 9810 x 0.82 N/m³

c) multiplying ##Q_2## (outgoing flow rate in m³/s) by 9810 x 0.82 N/m³ will give you the flow- rate in N/s as required.

Also, note that the model answer has some faults with rounding and use of significant figures. You may want to see if you can spot the faults!
 
drdyke said:
weight flow rate = unit weight x Q
… where Q is the volume per unit time, and unit weight means weight per unit volume.
(volume/time)x(weight/volume)=(weight/time).
drdyke said:
…here the process became weight flow rate = unit weight (SG) x Q
SG is defined as the mass of a given volume of the substance divided by the mass of an equal volume of water.
weight of volume V of substance = (mass of volume V of substance) x g
= (mass of volume V of water) x SG x g = (weight of volume V of water) x SG
Dividing through by the volume:
weight per unit volume V of substance = (weight per unit volume V of water) x SG
i.e.
unit weight of substance = (unit weight of water) x SG
 
drdyke said:
weight flow rate = unit weight (SG) x Q
What if this oil tank happens to be located on the ISS, on the moon or in the engine compartment of a formula 1 race car in the middle of turn 1 using a convention that ##g## is measured relative to the race car frame.
 
  • #10
jbriggs444 said:
What if this oil tank happens to be located on the ISS, on the moon or in the engine compartment of a formula 1 race car in the middle of turn 1 using a convention that ##g## is measured relative to the race car frame.
Agreed, but this bizarre use of weight per unit time as a measure of flow rate seems to come from the problem setter. We can but sigh.
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
Agreed, but this bizarre use of weight per unit time as a measure of flow rate seems to come from the problem setter. We can but sigh.
I have occasionally encountered questions of this kind where the author expects an answer in outré units apparently for no other reason than to be irritating. The end result is detraction from the underlying physical principle that is showcased. Sigh indeed.
 
  • #12
kuruman said:
I have occasionally encountered questions of this kind where the author expects an answer in outré units apparently for no other reason than to be irritating. The end result is detraction from the underlying physical principle that is showcased. Sigh indeed.
Judging from 8.18 at , it may have arisen as a translation from pounds/s.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top