Simple Theoretical Question about Ampere's Law

AI Thread Summary
To determine if a current is "enclosed" in a closed path, one must assess whether the current flows through the path, either entering or exiting it. When two currents flow in opposite directions within the enclosed path, they can cancel each other out, affecting the net current. In the case of a spherical shell with surface current density, the net current outside the sphere may be zero if the currents effectively cancel. The reasoning parallels that of a solenoid or toroid, where external magnetic fields are negligible due to symmetry. Additionally, the influence of changing electric fields, as per Maxwell's correction, must be considered in such scenarios.
Lomion
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

This one's an easy one: What's the easiest way of telling whether a current is "enclosed" in a closed path or not? And how can I tell when a current effectively cancels itself out?

For example, let's say I have a spherical shell with surface current density K [A/m], and I want to find H outside the sphere. Would this be 0 because whatever total current is over the sphere, the current flowing would eventually cancel each other out. Is this a valid assumption, even for K not constant?

Would the reasoning for something like this be similar to the reasoning for H = 0 outside a solenoid (approximately!) and a toroid?

Any clarifications would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a look at the Closed Path. If a current is running through the closed path either going in or out of it, then the current is enclosed in the closed path. If the current is outside of the closed path,, the current is not enclosed in the closed path.

Well, if there are two currents I_1 and I_2 running in opposite directions to each other through the enclosed path, then the currents will subtract each other, and depending the amount of amps, depends on whether they completely cancel or don't completely cancel each other out. The Two currents will subtract each other no matter how you do the integration

\int B ds clockwise or counterclockwise.

Now if there are more then two currents, then the right hand rule must be used. Depending on which way you integrate depends on which way your use your right hand rule around the closed path. Your Currents being positive or negative depends on the right hand rule(whether you integrate clockwise or counterclockwise).
 
zeronem said:
Take a look at the Closed Path. If a current is running through the closed path either going in or out of it, then the current is enclosed in the closed path. If the current is outside of the closed path,, the current is not enclosed in the closed path.

I know this sounds a bit stupid, but that's exactly what I'm confused about in my first example. Basically, I put a loop outside of the spherical shell. And depending on where I put the loop, it will either enclose the sphere, and hence have current going through it, or not enclose the sphere, and have no current going through it (At any given R). In fact, if I move the loop up or down, it will contain different surface areas of the sphere.

My TA said that since the current was circling on the sphere's surface, then the net current is zero. But I'm sort of having trouble seeing this.

Help?
 
How is the current flowing? Like lines of latitude, or longitude, or something else? Also, you must also include the changing electric field in the loop because of maxwells correction.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top