Simplest way of deriving Lorentz transforms

  • Thread starter Thread starter RobikShrestha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deriving Lorentz
RobikShrestha
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Is there a way to derive Lorentz transforms by knowing just Galilean/Newtonian relativity (adding up velocities) and Pythagoras theorem? I do not understand the principle of homogeneity or any higher mathematics. I can derive t' = gamma * t by using common sense and Pythagoras theorem. I am looking for such easy way to derive Lorentz transforms. I am really new at 'relativity' please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a cute method for deriving the length equations. Imagine a person swimming in a river with current v m/s. The person himself can swim at c m/s. First, he swims a length l downstream and the same length upstream. His speed, relative to the shore as he swims downstream, is c+v and the time required to swim downstream a length l is
\frac{l}{c+ v}.
His speed, relative to the shore as he swims upstream, is c- v and the time required to swim upstream a length l is
\frac{l}{c- v}

so his total time is
\frac{l}{c+ v}+ \frac{l}{c- v}= \frac{l(c- v)+ l(c+ v)}{c^2- v^2}= \frac{2lc}{c^2- v^2}= \frac{2}{c}\frac{l}{1- \left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}

Now, he swims a distance l' across the river and back. Of course, to do that, he must angle slightly upstream so that the vector addition of his speed and the river's will keep him moving across the river. If he take time t, then our vector diagram is a right triangle with hypotenuse of length ct, one leg of length cv, and the other of length l'. By the Pythagorean theorem, (ct)^2= (vt)^2+ l'^2. Then (c^2- v^2)t= l'^2 so that
t^2= \frac{l'^2}{c^2- v^2}
and
t= \frac{l'}{\sqrt{c^2- v^2}}= \frac{1}{c}\frac{l'}{\sqrt{1- \left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}}

That is one way across. Coming back will take exactly the same time and so the total time will be
\frac{2}{c}\frac{l'}{\sqrt{1- \left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}}.

Now, suppose these two swims take exactly the same time. That is,
\frac{2}{c}\frac{l}{1- \left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}= \frac{2}{c}\frac{l'}{\sqrt{1- \left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}}

Then we must have
l= l'\sqrt{1- \left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}
and
l'= \frac{l}{\sqrt{1- \left(\frac{v}{c}\right)^2}}.

Now, do you see how that relates to the Michaelson-Moreley experiment and length contraction?
 
Thanks. Now I have another question: the above derivation assumes the person to be a point. I want to assume the person as a 'length' i.e. I want to keep track of both points of the person (head and legs). This I believe should directly prove length contraction: length2 = length1 / gamma. I can derive t' or l' for an event crossing my frame of reference at the origin. But what if it crosses at x=xo and travels with v velocity? I am struggling to derive the transforms. WHAT I REALLY WANT TO DERIVE is: t' = gamma * (t + x * v / (c*c)). I am really struggling with that.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top