MHB Simplification of surds and powers

  • Thread starter Thread starter danielw
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying expressions involving surds and powers, with a user seeking help after arriving at incorrect values for x, y, and z. Another participant suggests a method for handling multiplication of powers and provides a detailed step-by-step solution using index notation. The correct simplification leads to the expression 6√[4]{5^5}. Additionally, there is a recommendation to learn LaTeX for better clarity in mathematical communication. The conversation highlights the importance of proper notation and method in solving such problems.
danielw
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi All

I have this problem. My workings are attached.

View attachment 5870

My answer was:

x=4
y=5
z=6

This is wrong. I don't know where I'm going wrong.

I'd be really grateful if someone could help.

Thanks!

Daniel

View attachment 5869
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1335.JPG
    IMG_1335.JPG
    9.6 KB · Views: 101
  • Capture1.PNG
    Capture1.PNG
    4.5 KB · Views: 96
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can't see the image clearly but I think this is what I would do.
For the multiplication portion
[5^(6/24)][(5^(24/5))/(5^5)]
= [5^(6/24)][(5^(24/5))(5^-5)]

Hint: (x^2)*(x^3) =?
vs (x^2)^3?
 
danielw said:
x=4
y=5
z=6

This is wrong.

No, it's correct! I can't make out your working so I'll post mine for comparison:

$$7\cdot\sqrt[12]{5^{15}}-\sqrt[24]{5^6}\cdot\sqrt[4]{5^{24}}/5^5$$

Rewrite in index notation:

$$=7\cdot5^{5/4}-5^{1/4}\cdot5^6/5^5$$

$$=7\cdot5^{5/4}-5^{1/4+6-5}$$

$$=7\cdot5^{5/4}-5^{5/4}$$

$$=6\cdot5^{5/4}$$

$$=6\sqrt[4]{5^5}$$

You might want to consider learning $\LaTeX$. Quote this post to see the code I have used.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top