Simplify the boolean expression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying a complex boolean expression before constructing its truth table. Participants suggest that while simplification can be beneficial, directly building the truth table may be more efficient due to the limited number of variables (three). The usual method involves first creating the truth table, then using it to generate a Karnaugh map for further simplification. One participant recommends transforming the expression into a "Sum of Products" format to facilitate filling in the truth table. Overall, the consensus leans towards prioritizing the truth table over simplification for this specific problem.
larry21
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Build the truth tables for the boolean expressions.

(x + y' * z)' + (x * y * z' + (y + z)') + (y + (x * z')')'

The Attempt at a Solution


Given that the expression is so complex I believe that I need to simplify first then proceed to build the truth table?

Work so far:
(x + y' * z)' + (x * y * z' + (y + z)') + (y + (x * z')')'

1.) x' * y'' + z' + (x * y * z' + y' + z') + y' * (x * z')''
2.) x' * y + z' + (x * y * z' + y' + z') + y' * x * z'

Steps:
1. De Morgan
2. De Morgan and double negation

Kind of stuck at this point...
Help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it were me, I'd skip the simplification and go straight to the truth table. There's only three input variables (x, y and z), so your truth table has only eight rows.

There's nothing stopping you from simplifying beforehand, but as it turns out, going straight to the truth table is often the easiest approach.

The reason I say this is because the usual approach to minimization is:
(1) Build the truth table
(2) Use the truth table to make a Karnaugh map (K-map) and simplify that way (or use the Quine–McCluskey algorithm or equivalent).

Simplifying before the truth table sort of defeats the point. Sure, you can do it, but it might not be the best way to expend your effort.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
That said,

If you do choose to simplify a little before making the truth table, I suggest trying to put the expression in the form of "Sum of Products." It makes it a little easier to fill in the table that way. It's not totally necessary, but it couldn't hurt.

There are a couple of mistakes below I think.

larry21 said:
Work so far:
(x + y' * z)' + (x * y * z' + (y + z)') + (y + (x * z')')'

1.) x' * y'' + z' + (x * y * z' + y' + z') + y' * (x * z')''
2.) x' * y + z' + (x * y * z' + y' + z') + y' * x * z'
I think you mean, (changes in red)

1.) x' * (y'' + z') + (x * y * z' + y' * z') + y' * (x * z')''
2.) x' * (y + z') + (x * y * z' + y' * z') + y' * x * z'
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top