Simplifying a Fraction with Negative Exponents

  • Thread starter Thread starter LearntIsFun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents Negative
LearntIsFun
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering something when you have a equation:(Of course "^" represents to the power)

4e^4(j^-3)
____________
2d^-3(f^2)
________
2c^2(j^-2)

I know how to get rid of the negative exponents to get:

4e^4j^-3
__________
j^2(f^2)
_________
2d^3(2c^2)

Question comes with bringing the bottom fraction up to multiply and simplify. Do you just have to take the reciprocal of the fraction to multiply or just bring the fraction as is up to multiply because if you take the reciprocal, do the exponents go negative per the rules?

Appreciate the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand your original writing, the first fraction is

<br /> \frac{4e^4 j^{-3}}{\left(\dfrac{2d^{-3}f^2}{2c^2j^{-2}}\right)}<br />

If this is correct, your second fraction is only partially correct you wrote

<br /> \frac{4e^4 j^{-3}}{\left(\dfrac{j^2 f^2}{\left(2d^3\right) \left(2c^2\right)}\right)}<br />

Look at your original work and decide whether you really mean to write (2c^2)(2d^3) in this expression.

Regardless of that, the answer to the second portion of your question is that you need to perform the classic ''invert and multiply'' to deal with the bottom fraction. As an example,

<br /> \frac{x^5 y^{-6}}{\left(\dfrac{x^2}{y^2}\right)} = \left(x^5 y^{-6}\right) \cdot \frac{y^2}{x^2} = x^{5-2} y^{-6+2} = x^3 y^{-4} = \frac{x^3}{y^4}<br />

Be aware that there are multiple routes that can be taken to simplify fractions like these, and while the workings of two or three different people may seem to be different, if all rules are followed correctly the same answer will result.
 
So, just to clarify, when taking the reciprocal of the fraction and multiplying it, the exponents still stay positive regardless of the flip, right?

Look at your original work and decide whether you really mean to write in this expression.

Also, not sure about the bottom 2d^3(2c^2) part. Looks correct to me as of right now my knowledge of change negative exponents, but since you're brining it up, it must be incorrect somehow, appreciate your help! :)
 
Your first question
LearntIsFun said:
So, just to clarify, when taking the reciprocal of the fraction and multiplying it, the exponents still stay positive regardless of the flip, right?

has as its answer a resounding YES .

Now for your second question.
LearntIsFun said:
Also, not sure about the bottom 2d^3(2c^2) part. Looks correct to me as of right now my knowledge of change negative exponents, but since you're brining it up, it must be incorrect somehow, appreciate your help! :)

The denominator of the original compound fraction is

<br /> \frac{2d^{-3} f^2}{2c^2 j^{-2}}<br />

If the entire problem were to simplify just this fraction , what would you do with the pair of 2s ?
 
Ah, I see now said the blind man :D Those two's can be reduced to 1's, totally overlooked it, I just wrote the equation making stuff up to use as an example and didn't take the time to see that. Thanks for the heads up, my mistakes are always overlooking the simpliest things sometimes. I always am striving to get better at that.
-LearntIsFun! :)
 
Last edited:
Your first question
LearntIsFun said:
So, just to clarify, when taking the reciprocal of the fraction and multiplying it, the exponents still stay positive regardless of the flip, right?

has as its answer a resounding YES .

Now for your second question.
LearntIsFun said:
Also, not sure about the bottom 2d^3(2c^2) part. Looks correct to me as of right now my knowledge of change negative exponents, but since you're brining it up, it must be incorrect somehow, appreciate your help! :)

The denominator of the original compound fraction is

<br /> \frac{2d^{-3} f^2}{2c^2 j^{-2}}<br />

If the entire problem were to simplify just this fraction , what would you do with the pair of 2s ?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top