Simply cannot get my calculator to give me the correct answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jowin86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculator
AI Thread Summary
The user is struggling to obtain the correct damping ratio using their calculator, which they believe should yield 0.1971 based on a tutorial example. They are calculating using the formula Damping ratio = √(E² / (4π²n²E²)), with E=2.526 and n=2. However, they are getting incorrect results of 0.0796 and 0.0398 due to a potential misunderstanding of the equation. Other participants suggest that the user may have miswritten the formula, as having E² in both the numerator and denominator would cancel out. Clarifying the equation is essential for obtaining the correct answer.
Jowin86
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Simply cannot get my calculator to give me the correct answer!?

Homework Statement



I'm going through a worked example I did in a tutorial and cannot get the same answer we did in class with my calc!?


Homework Equations



Damping ratio = the square root of E2 / 4∏2 n2 E2

Where E=2.526 n=2

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm getting 0.0796 , doing 4x(pie2) and 0.0398 doing (4xpie)2

The answer from tutorial is 0.1971 and is deffinately correct.

I've broken each bit down and worked it out separately and put it into the calc then in the simplified way but still I'm not getting the right answer :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Jowin86 said:
Damping ratio = the square root of E2 / 4∏2 n2 E2
Can you retype that equation, using parentheses as needed. It looks like you have E2 twice.
 


Yeah that what I've got written down in my notes. Maybe I copied it down wrong?
 


Jowin86 said:
Yeah that what I've got written down in my notes. Maybe I copied it down wrong?
You must have. You have an E2 in numerator and denominator, which would cancel out. (I doubt that's what was meant.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top