Simply supported deep beam deflection

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the deflection and stress analysis of a simply supported deep beam under a uniformly distributed load, considering three different support scenarios. The user is observing significant differences in results from finite element analysis (FEA) based on the support locations: bottom, mid-point, and top of the beam ends. It is noted that deep beams do not conform to the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, leading to varying outcomes akin to plate problems influenced by boundary conditions. The complexity arises from treating each support configuration as a distinct problem, which inherently results in different solutions. Understanding the specific mechanics behind these variations is crucial for accurate analysis.
Daniel Tyler
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a problem with simply supported deep beam which has a uniformly distributed load. The beam is simply supported at both ends but I have to consider the results for the following 3 scenarios
- where the support is at the bottom of each end of the beam
- where the support is at the mid point at each end of the beam
- where support is at top of each end of the beam

I have run this using FEA and I'm finding significantly different deflections and stresses when the beam is supported at the midpoint at its end and the other two scenarios...can anyone explain the exact reasoning for this?

Sincere thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The deep beam does not follow the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation assumptions (particularly, that of plane sections remain plane). It is more like a plate problem, and different boundary conditions on a plate give different solutions.
 
Dr D

Thanks for your reply. I'm aware of that but could you be more specific on the difference that would occur where you have a pinned support at the bottom of a beams end and a pinned support at the mid-height of a beams end?

Your help is much appreciated

Many Thanks

Daniel
 
As I tried to say previously, you are looking at three different problems; why should you be surprised when you find three different solutions?
 
yes but I do not understand the reasons for the differences...
 
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Back
Top