Simulating rocket launches using excel

  • Thread starter Thread starter TESLER
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Excel Rocket
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a simulation project aimed at launching a rocket to orbit using Excel, focusing on reducing launch costs by optimizing fuel usage. The project simulates a two-stage LOX/RP-1 rocket, emphasizing the significant proportion of mass dedicated to propellants and exploring the potential of launching at a 45-degree angle with a mass driver to enhance payload capacity. Key challenges identified include accurately calculating the rocket's angle relative to its velocity vector, which affects the simulation's accuracy. The user acknowledges simplifications made in the model, particularly regarding orientation control, and seeks suggestions for improving the simulation. Overall, the project serves as a foundation for further exploration of rocket launch efficiencies.
TESLER
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
Over the past year, I have been trying to simulate the launch of a rocket to orbit using excel. I have been pretty successful, and I have what I think to be a mostly working product. However, it has some problems that may be affecting the results.

First, I'l explain roughly what I have done, and the main idea behind the project.

So anyone who is fairly well acquainted with modern rocketry knows that when a rocket takes off, most of its mass and volume are occupied by propellants at 85-90%, with maybe 8-10% being for the structure/infrastructure, and the remainder being payload. However, I was wondering if there could be a way of making rockets less expensive, by removing the need for some of that fuel. For this I have simulated launching the rocket at 45 degrees, using a mass driver to accelerate the rocket to around 1200m/s, and therefore improving the ratio of fuel to payload, and decreasing launch costs. The attached spreadsheet simulates the launch of a 7000kg LOX/RP-1 two stage rocket, capable of putting around 200kg in orbit (around 450 if the mass of the second stage is included). As a note, this is not intended to be a pure physics sim, and therefore it is not perfect. Instead, it is a simulation of a complex engineering problem, which provides a solid baseline for further inquiry.

However, there are a few problems which I can see affecting my results.

The first is that the angle of the rocket to the ground is quite a problem to figure out. Since the spreadsheet calculates for the rocket every 2 seconds, I assumed the angle would be the approximately the same as what it had been 2 seconds before. However, that assumes that the rocket is always pointing in the same direction as its velocity vector. If anyone has any other ideas for improvements, I would be very appreciative.


Unfortunately, the file is around 4mb, therefore too large to attach to this forum. Instead, download it here!

http://www.mediafire.com/view/?jgt7e0gc4wt4g47


Thanks, TESLER
 
Physics news on Phys.org
However, that assumes that the rocket is always pointing in the same direction as its velocity vector.
You have column B (RCS) to avoid that, right?

Air pressure has some weird steps.
 
Yeah, column B represents the control from engine gimbals/Vernier rockets/or fins in the exhaust that would allow the rocket to control its orientation. For the sake of simplicity, I had these inputs completely overpower the natural orientation of the rocket. Realistically, it would be slightly different, but I'm not hugely bothered about that...
 
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Back
Top