Single slit diffraction problem

AI Thread Summary
For light to diffract through a single slit, the slit width should be comparable to the wavelength of the light, not strictly less than or equal to it. A demonstration showed that even a slit width of 10^-4m can produce diffraction effects. The analogy of throwing a basketball through varying hole sizes illustrates that larger apertures can still cause diffraction if the light interacts with the edges. It is emphasized that diffraction occurs when the dimensions allow the light to "see" the edges of the aperture. Overall, the relationship between slit width and wavelength is more nuanced than a simple threshold.
Saado
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I've read that if you want light to diffract through a single slit, the slit opening must be equal too or less than the wavelength of the light. So for example, light of wavelength 600nm would diffract through a slit with width 600nm or less. Is this true? Or am I missing something. Since when I saw a demonstration, the slit width was only 10^-4m apart and the light began to diffract.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Its not that the width of the slit should be less than or equal to the wavelength of the light,it only should be comparable to it.
Think about it this way: Imagine you want to throw a basketball through a hole.If the hole is a circle of radius 10m,you will have no trouble doing it and its very improbable that you hit the ball to the edges. But if the hole has a radius of 0.25m,then its really probable that you hit the edges.There is no sharp distinction in the radius spectrum that says radii greater than this one mean that the ball always goes through the hole and radii smaller than this one mean that the ball always hits the edges.
Some people may say that the dimensions of the hole must be somehow that the light "sees" the edges and so acts properly and if the dimensions are somehow that the light doesn't "see" the edges,there will be no diffraction(with a good approximation).
 
With apertures that are much larger than the wavelength, you do get diffraction effects at the edges, provided of course that the light actually passes by the edges. The width of the aperture can even extend to infinity in one direction, as in knife-edge (straight-edge) diffraction:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/difopa.html#c1

Here's a picture:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/bardif.html

A couple more pictures, with non-straight edges:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/bardif3.html#c1
 
Ahh thank you for the replies
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top