Sinusoidal Pressure Wave: Questions & Answers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to a sinusoidal pressure wave in a gas, focusing on calculating the bulk modulus, wavelength, and frequency adjustments for sub-supersonic conditions. Participants express confusion about the term "sub-supersonic" and whether it implies needing to increase or decrease frequency. Clarifications suggest that understanding the motion of gas molecules during oscillation is key to solving the problem. Ultimately, one participant resolves their confusion by recognizing a missing factor of 2π in their calculations. The conversation highlights the complexity of interpreting physics problems and the importance of precise language in problem statements.
Plaetean
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a sinusoidal pressure wave in a gas with a fixed displacement amplitude of 1cm. The gas has a density of 2 kg m-3 and the wave travels at a velocity of 10 m s-1.
a) What is the bulk modulus of the gas? [3]
b) What is the wavelength of the wave if its temporal frequency is 1 kHz? [2]
c) By what factor must the frequency of the wave be increased for it to become sub-supersonic?



Homework Equations


v=fl=\sqrt{B/ρ}


The Attempt at a Solution


a) and b) I can answer fine, but I have no idea what c) is even asking. I have a solution sheet, and the solution is given here, but I can't follow it at all I'm afraid.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not entirely sure, but I think what it's saying is currently, the frequency is supersonic, or f>the highest frequency sound waves.
By what factor must the frequency be increased so that f ≤ the highest frequency sound wave.
https://www.google.com/#q=soundwave+frequency+range

But my thing is: Perhaps they mean period? If it's supersonic, and you increase the frequency, it's not going to become sub-supersonic... Unless they want an answer less than 1, then the question is just poorly worded.
 
Just looked at the answer, and yes, the question is either a) poorly worded, or b) copied wrong.

So calculate the frequency of your wave, and take the ratio to find the factor you need to multiply it by to arrive at a frequency lower than supersonic.
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Just looked at the answer, and yes, the question is either a) poorly worded, or b) copied wrong.

So calculate the frequency of your wave, and take the ratio to find the factor you need to multiply it by to arrive at a frequency lower than supersonic.

Sorry if I'm missing something extremely basic, but how do you know what the 'supersonic' frequency is?
 
Plaetean said:
Sorry if I'm missing something extremely basic, but how do you know what the 'supersonic' frequency is?
I'm only guessing here, but...
Consider the motion of the gas molecules. With a sinusoidal motion of amplitude 1cm and a given frequency, how fast do the molecules have to move at peak speed during oscillation? How does that compare with the speed of a sound wave in the medium?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
haruspex said:
I'm only guessing here, but...
Consider the motion of the gas molecules. With a sinusoidal motion of amplitude 1cm and a given frequency, how fast do the molecules have to move at peak speed during oscillation? How does that compare with the speed of a sound wave in the medium?

Ahhh that must be it, thanks, I would never have thought of that on my own, question doesn't make it clear at all.
 
haruspex said:
I'm only guessing here, but...
Consider the motion of the gas molecules. With a sinusoidal motion of amplitude 1cm and a given frequency, how fast do the molecules have to move at peak speed during oscillation? How does that compare with the speed of a sound wave in the medium?

Sorry to bump this, but I've tried following through the problem along that line of thought and still can't reproduce the answer in the solutions sheet. If anyone understands how this problem is solved please could you enlighten me!

z09JPog.png


edit: **** I just figured it out, I had missed a factor of 2pi, sorry guys
 
Back
Top