Size/Mass of a planet needed in order to have a molten core or a magnetic field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the size and mass required for a planet to possess a molten core or a magnetic field, emphasizing that factors such as composition, density, and formation play crucial roles. It suggests that there may not be a strict limit on size, but rather that the planet's characteristics and age are significant. The conversation references the magnetic fields of Neptune and Uranus, highlighting that their magnetic fields may originate from liquid layers rather than the core itself. The need for more data and samples to draw definitive conclusions is acknowledged. Overall, understanding the interplay of these factors is essential for determining planetary characteristics.
jarroe
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
How big does a planet have to be in order for it to have a molten core or a magnetic field? Assuming no other large objects were close enough to affect the planet with their own pull or magnetic field. I would imagine the composition/density of the planet would play a factor as well, but do we have any formulas out there that would descibe this. Perhaps we don't have enough samples/data to make an informed decision on this yet?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Age of the planet would factor in as well I am sure?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top