Size of proton, neutron and electron

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relative sizes of protons, neutrons, and electrons, with a focus on the confusion surrounding their measurements. The consensus in the class is that protons and neutrons are equal in size, assigned a relative value of 1, while the electron is considered negligible in size. One participant suggests specific measurements in femtometers for protons and neutrons but struggles with the concept of the electron's size, which is described as dependent on its wave function. The importance of understanding relative sizes rather than absolute measurements is emphasized, highlighting that the electron's size, if defined, would be extremely small compared to protons and neutrons. Ultimately, the discussion clarifies that the question requires a comparison of sizes rather than precise measurements.
Lucy11802
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So my teacher set us half term homework and one of the questions was state the relative size of a proton a neutron and an electron

Homework Equations


Not sure about equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Im a bit confused because everyone in my class got
Proton: 1
Neutron: 1
Electron: negligible
But i got-
Proton: 0.84 fermatons (idk if that's spelt right)
Neutron: 0.84 fermatons
Electron: The size of its wave function

Im confused and need a bit of help- I am in year 9 so I am not reall hugley educated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you mean femtometer (sometimes called Fermi).
Lucy11802 said:
Electron: The size of its wave function
That is a problematic approach, because it means the size of the electron depends on where it is. If you want to use this approach, then you should also consider wave functions for protons and neutrons.

The question was about relative sizes. 0.84 femtometer is the absolute size.
 
mfb said:
I guess you mean femtometer (sometimes called Fermi).That is a problematic approach, because it means the size of the electron depends on where it is. If you want to use this approach, then you should also consider wave functions for protons and neutrons.

The question was about relative sizes. 0.84 femtometer is the absolute size.
Oh okay thanks, so should i just make the size less accurate and change the electron one then?
 
What do you mean by "less accurate"?

If the electron has an intrinsic size (in the same way as proton and neutron have a size), it has to be extremely tiny.
 
Lucy11802 said:
Oh okay thanks, so should i just make the size less accurate and change the electron one then?
You are asked for the relative size, i.e., compared to each other. If you are twice as tall as your little sister, then your relative sizes are 2 and 1 (or 1 and 1/2), whatever your heights are in meters.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top