Sketching EM Waves with imaginary amplitudes

hutchwilco
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Sketch in 3D, the following waves. (both E fields are in x direction
E_1 = 3*exp(-j*8*Pi*z)
E_2 = 4j*exp(-j*8*Pi*z)

(where j=sqrt(-1)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to sketch E_1, but my question is how to treat the imaginary amplitude, 4j in E_2.
here is my stab at it: the amplitude is really of form (a+jb) but with no real component.
ie 0 +4j. but how to sketch this?
but I can't find any conclusive info in my textbook or lecture notes on how to sketch this - do i just draw the wave as normal and say the max amplitude is "4j" ? this doesn't seem right to me since you can't have a 4j E field in reality so you shouldn't be able to sketch one!
if I do this, how then do i combine waves as a follow up question may be sketch E_1 + E_2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are only going to be able to sketch the real part of the function...for E_1, that's 3cos(8*Pi*z), for E_2, euler's identity gives 4j*exp(-j*8*Pi*z)=4j[cos(8*Pi*z)-j*sin(8*Pi*z)]=[4jcos(8*Pi*z)+4sin(8*Pi*z)] and so the real part is just 4sin(8*Pi*z).
 
ah thankyou! eulers identity... i should have known!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top