Sketching exponential curves with complex numbers

AI Thread Summary
To sketch the function y as a function of t for t≥0, the equation y = e^(0.5t + i(√7/2)t) - e^(0.5t - i(√7/2)t) simplifies to y = e^(0.5t)(i * 2sin(√7/2 * t)). The resulting function is purely imaginary, indicating that the curve will only exist along the imaginary axis. Since it represents a function from real numbers to complex numbers, it requires a three-dimensional graph to fully represent both the value and the argument. However, as clarified, the graph can be simplified to a single dimension by plotting y = e^(0.5t)sin(√7/2 * t) and labeling the y-axis as imaginary numbers. This approach effectively captures the behavior of the curve.
dan5
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
How do you go about sketching y as a function of t for t≥0

y= e(0.5t + i(√7/2)t) - e(0.5t-i(√7/2)t)


I know it goes through the origin, and the gradient is positive here. But I'm unsure on how to deal with the imaginary numbers when I have a graph of y vs t.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you try to simplify it using the definition of complex exponentiation. That is:

e^{a+ib}=e^a(\cos(b)+i\sin(b))
 
Thanks for that idea, I have done that and am left with

y=e0.5t ( i 2 sin (√7/2)t )

But as I am meant to be plotting y as a function of t, I don't see how the imaginary part will factor in
 
Well, it will be immediately obvious that no point on the curve will have a real part. So the curve will only move on the imaginary axis.
 
In general, a function from R to C (real numbers to complex numbers) requires two dimensions for the value as well as one dimension for the argument- in other words, a three dimensional graph! However, as micromass points out, y= [e^{0.5t}sin(\sqrt{7}{2}t)]i is always imaginary so you you really only need a single dimension for that.

Graph y= e^{0.5t}sin((\sqrt{7}/2)t), clearly labeling the "y" axis as imaginary numbers.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top