Sliding Block Problem: Finding Distance Traveled

  • Thread starter Thread starter ksle82
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Sliding
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total distance a sled travels down an incline, factoring in gravitational and frictional forces. Participants note that the problem lacks sufficient information, particularly regarding the sled's initial velocity and the coefficient of friction. The equation vo² = 2ax is referenced to relate initial velocity, acceleration, and distance, with emphasis on constant forces acting on the sled. There is debate over the direction of forces, with clarification that both gravitational and frictional forces act down the incline. Ultimately, the consensus is that more data is needed to solve the problem accurately.
ksle82
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6991&stc=1&d=1148442038
rocket1.JPG
Given the data in the drawing, find the total distance the sled travel.
I got stuck after summing all the forces in the X direction. Help! Here's what i have so far.

Sum of all Forces in X Dir: mgsin(theta) - f = ma
where mgsin(theta) is force due to gravity in the x-dir,
and f is the friction force.
 

Attachments

  • rocket1.JPG
    rocket1.JPG
    8.1 KB · Views: 693
Physics news on Phys.org
There is insufficient information to solve the problem.

The sled presumably has an initial velocity (not given), and there is a component of gravity acting in the -x direction and friction, which also acts in -x direction.

Since the final velocity is zero, one can use vo2 = 2 a x, where vo is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration (or deceleration) determined from the forces of gravity and friction, and x is the distance traveled.
 
ksle82 said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6991&stc=1&d=1148442038
rocket1.JPG
Given the data in the drawing, find the total distance the sled travel.
I got stuck after summing all the forces in the X direction. Help! Here's what i have so far.

Sum of all Forces in X Dir: mgsin(theta) - f = ma
where mgsin(theta) is force due to gravity in the x-dir,
and f is the friction force.
Why are you assuming the gravitational force and frictional force are in opposite directions? They should both be down the incline.
 
Is this incline infinitly long or does it leave the incline at some point and become a projectile? Eitherway there is not enough information. I am assuming that the u is the co-efficent of kinetic friction.

~H
 
Astronuc said:
There is insufficient information to solve the problem.

The sled presumably has an initial velocity (not given), and there is a component of gravity acting in the -x direction and friction, which also acts in -x direction.

Since the final velocity is zero, one can use vo2 = 2 a x, where vo is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration (or deceleration) determined from the forces of gravity and friction, and x is the distance traveled.

Yes i do feel that's the question is rather vague or doen'st have enough info. But i just copied out of the study package that was given to me.

Yes, vo is the initial velocity. How did you arrive at vo2=2ax astronuc?
 
ksle82 said:
Yes i do feel that's the question is rather vague or doen'st have enough info. But i just copied out of the study package that was given to me.

Yes, vo is the initial velocity. How did you arrive at vo2 = 2ax astronuc?
That's actually a special case for constant acceleration.

The change in kinetic energy is equal to the product of the force applied over a distance, or

1/2 m v22 - 1/2 m v12 = m a x. Let v2 = vo, and the final velocity v1 = 0. Multiply the equation by 2 and divide by m and one obtains,

vo2 = 2ax

For the problem stated, the x component of the gravitation force is constant (it doesn't change over a short distance) and one assumes that friction is contant. The force due to friction is proportional to the normal force of the sled on the surface of the slope.

If vo is sufficiently large, then the distance traveled could be significant and the acceleration due to gravity would vary as a function of the altitude (height).

One may find this useful - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mot.html#mot1
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top