Slinky springs and eq of motion.

AI Thread Summary
A mass on a frictionless surface is connected to two slinky springs with different constants, k1 and k2, affecting its equilibrium position. The equation of motion is derived by analyzing the forces acting on the mass when displaced, leading to the expression mx" + (k1 - k2)x = 0. The discussion clarifies that at equilibrium, the net force is zero, and both springs exert forces that restore the mass to equilibrium when displaced. The key point is that the change in force from each spring contributes positively to the net restoring force. Understanding the dynamics of the springs is crucial for accurately modeling the system's behavior.
JoshuaR
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
A mass is resting on a horizontal surface without friction. It is connected on both sides by slinky springs k1 and k2 (that is they have different spring constants, and the equilibrium position will not be in the center of the system). First I had to find the equation of motion after setting up the forces. I've seen an example of a mass connected on either side by a spring and k=k1+k2. This is because whichever side of equilibrium you place the mass, the forces act in the same direction, one pulls and one pushes, basically. In this however, the slinky springs naturally are of length L0, or they are close to zero before stretched. Therefore both springs are pulling away from the center no matter where you set the displacement. It is just that one is pulling more than the other, being displaced further. (This is my reasoning so far.) So if I displace to the right, I say sum of forces=ma=-k1x+k2x. That is the force of k1 pulls to the left while k2 to the right. So I have mx"+(k1-k2)x=0 or x"+((k1-k2)/m)x=0. Is this right? Or should I have done (K1+k2)?

Thanks, Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JoshuaR said:
I've seen an example of a mass connected on either side by a spring and k=k1+k2. This is because whichever side of equilibrium you place the mass, the forces act in the same direction, one pulls and one pushes, basically.
OK.

In this however, the slinky springs naturally are of length L0, or they are close to zero before stretched. Therefore both springs are pulling away from the center no matter where you set the displacement.
Are you saying that the springs are unstretched when the mass is at equilibrium? In any case, the only thing that matters is the change in the force that each spring exerts when the mass is displaced from equilibrium.

When the mass is at the equilibrium position, the net force is always zero. The springs are either both pushing or both pulling or both exerting no force. When the mass is displaced from equilibrium, the change in force exerted by each spring is always in the same direction: towards the equilibrium position. Thus both springs contribute positively to the net restoring force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top