Small oscillations: diagonal matrix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to small oscillations in a mechanical system, specifically involving the kinetic matrix and the Hessian matrix of potential energy. The original poster is exploring the relationship between the matrices and the normal modes of oscillation represented by two angles, \(\theta\) and \(\phi\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the normal modes from the diagonal matrix formed by \(\omega^2 T - H\) and questions whether the proposed forms of \(\theta(t)\) and \(\phi(t)\) are correct. There is also a discussion about the eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalues of the system.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided feedback on the original poster's approach, noting a minor mistake regarding the values of \(\omega\) and confirming the correctness of the eigenvector assignments. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these eigenvectors on the solution of motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework exercise, which may limit the information available and the assumptions that can be made about the system's behavior.

bznm
Messages
181
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm solving an exercise about small oscillations.

I name T the kinetic matrix and $H$ the hessian matrix of potential.

The matrix \omega^2 T- H is diagonal and so find the auto-frequencies is easy! But I have a problem with normal modes. The lagrangian coordinates are two angles, \theta and \phi.

$$\omega^2T-H(\theta, \phi)=\begin{pmatrix}m\omega^2-m \Omega &&&0 \\
0&&&M\omega^2-k
\end{pmatrix}$$

Normal modes are given by splitted oscillations of the two coordinates. Is it correct? Are they given by:
\theta(t)=A_1 \cos(\Omega t+ \alpha_1) and \phi(t)=A_2(\cos \frac{k}{M} t+\alpha_2)? (A_1, A_2= constants depending on initial conditions)

And is the general solution of motion given by $$\theta(t)+\phi(t)=A_1 \cos(\Omega t+ \alpha_1)+A_2(\cos \frac{k}{M} t+\alpha_2)$$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
looks pretty good. Except one slight mistake. hint: check the values of omega.
 
BruceW said:
looks pretty good. Except one slight mistake. hint: check the values of omega.

Thanks for your answer!
I have forgotten the square for ω..

But I have a doubt:
If I find the eigenvectors, I obtain:

- If \omega^2=\Omega
the eigenvector is (μ_1,0)

- if \omega^2=k/M
the eigenvector is (0, μ_2)

where μ_1 and μ_2 belong to ℝ.

So, the correct solution of motion, introduced the q_i coordinates that shift the origin of the system in the point of equilibrium, should be:

{\bf q}(t)=A_1 cos (\sqrt(\omega)t+\alpha_1) \begin{pmatrix}\mu_1\\0 \end{pmatrix}+A_2 cos (\sqrt(k/M)t+\alpha_2) \begin{pmatrix}0\\μ_2 \end{pmatrix}

is it correct? thanks again
 
Last edited:
yeah, that all agrees with the matrix equation you wrote in the first post. Except one thing. You have written the eigenvectors the wrong way around. The whole idea of the normal mode method is that the matrix you wrote, when acting on an eigenvector, should give a zero vector. So when omega squared equal k/M, then what should the eigenvector be?

Edit: woops, ah sorry sorry. You did write them the correct way around. I didn't take the time to look at the matrix product carefully enough. So all your work is correct.
 
Thank you so much!
 
no worries! you had pretty much done it already.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K