Smallest Tokamak Reactor Size: Can it be in a Garage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VelociBlade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tokamak
AI Thread Summary
Creating a tokamak reactor in a small space like a garage or basement is deemed impractical due to the extreme magnetic fields and power requirements necessary for fusion. While theoretically, a tokamak could be built at any size if it contains enough hydrogen atoms, the challenges of maintaining stable plasma and achieving sustained fusion output remain significant. Current technology allows only for brief bursts of fusion, and there is no effective method to continuously feed fuel into the reactor. Additionally, safety concerns regarding radiation and the complexity of magnetic confinement further complicate the feasibility of home-built reactors. Overall, while the ambition to explore tokamak technology is commendable, practical implementation at a small scale is not yet achievable.
VelociBlade
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
What is the smallest size for a tokamak reactor? I was wondering if it was possible to create it in a garage or basement like a fusor.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
im no physicist, but wouldn't you be able to make a tokamak reactor of any size as long as the containment chamber contains enough hydrogen atoms to fuse together? of course the containment chamber size would need to be proportional to the amount of energy you desire to output. the magnetic fields to achieve fusion would be extreme regardless of size, you would need a serious power source to make even a nominal amount of energy. watch out for the radiation mind you. if magnetic confinement is the only method of compression to reach the required kinetic energy level, that is a serious component of your project. the excitement of the atoms to my knowledge usually incorporates radio waves, and other forms of EMR.
in my mind, making a home-made tokamak reactor is not practical. I applaud your efforts to explore this technology; but it is not yet practical at this level.
there are many many problems with this technology as it exists today, you can only get a burst of fusion because there is no current piratical method to feed your reactor with fuel. it will burn itself out. the problems with creating a stable plasma are not very encouraging either.
Google fusion reactors and the concepts behind them as well as the energy requirements; it will give you an idea of what you are trying to do.
-way to be ambitious!

check out the threads
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=245508
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=208519
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top