Smoke Rising in Still Air: Physics Explanation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of incense smoke in still air, highlighting the transition from laminar to turbulent flow. Initially, the smoke rises straight up due to laminar flow, but it eventually dissipates as turbulence increases. The transition distance is predictable and influenced by factors like velocity and fluid properties. The smoke is classified as a fluid because it consists of air and visible particles. Understanding these flow dynamics is essential for comprehending air behavior in various contexts, such as aerodynamics.
Chris R
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I have what I believe is a simple physics question. I was burning a sprig of incense in my apartment, and noticed that the smoke was rising from the burning section perfectly straight up into the air for a good meter, and then started to dissipate into the air. I know that a gas will disperse into the air, but I was slightly puzzled because the smoke is a solid. My question is if there was a room with perfectly still air, would the smoke rise straight up all the way to the ceiling, or would it behave more like a gas and dissipate into the air regardless? Also, what properties would explain this?
Thanks!
CR
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

This is actually an interesting demonstration of laminar vs turbulent flow. Most fluid flow streams (the smoke is a fluid -- it's air and exhaust gases that you can see because of suspended ash particles in it) start of laminar (linear/coherent) and after a while transition to turbulent. The distance until transition is actually highly predictable and depends on velocity, size/length of the flow stream, and the properties of the fluid. It is also an important part of our understanding of how air behaves as it flows over a wing.

Here's more on the phenomena:
http://profs.sci.univr.it/~zuccher/research/blstability/

Here's the number/equation that characterizes the behavior of a flow stream:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_number
 
Very interesting, thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top