Sn1 Reactions: Substrate structure vs leaving group stabilit

AI Thread Summary
In an Sn1 nucleophilic reaction, the stability of the carbocation intermediate and the leaving group are both crucial factors. A tertiary carbon forms a more stable intermediate compared to a secondary carbon, while iodine is a better leaving group than bromine. The discussion highlights the competition between substrate structure and leaving group stability in determining reaction rates. Additionally, solvent polarity may influence these factors, potentially affecting the overall reaction kinetics. Understanding the interplay between these elements is essential for predicting which compound will react first.
ThousandFjord
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let's say I have two compounds in an identical solvent. The compounds are also identical except for the following: One has a Br bonded to a tertiary carbon, and the other has an I bonded to a secondary carbon. Which would react first in an Sn1 nucleophilic reaction?

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



On the one hand, the first compound would form a more stable intermediate (tertiary vs secondary carbon), but on the other hand, the second compound has a more stable leaving group (I vs Br). So I have no idea. Basically, I'd like to know which is more important in Sn1 reactions: substrate structure or leaving group stability? Why? (And where would solvent polarity fit in the ranking, while we're at it?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ThousandFjord said:

Homework Statement



Let's say I have two compounds in an identical solvent. The compounds are also identical except for the following: One has a Br bonded to a tertiary carbon, and the other has an I bonded to a secondary carbon. Which would react first in an Sn1 nucleophilic reaction?

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



On the one hand, the first compound would form a more stable intermediate (tertiary vs secondary carbon), but on the other hand, the second compound has a more stable leaving group (I vs Br). So I have no idea. Basically, I'd like to know which is more important in Sn1 reactions: substrate structure or leaving group stability? Why? (And where would solvent polarity fit in the ranking, while we're at it?)

You have two factors, one favours one reaction, the other favours the other. I don't know what other knowledge one can draw on to say which is more important. But if there is something like solvent that influences one of these factors mainly you could make a prediction about how it affects the relative rates of these two. The lecture below says something about that towards the end.

http://www.khanacademy.org/science/organic-chemistry/substitution-elimination-reactions/sn1-sn2-sal/v/solvent-effects-on-sn1-and-sn2-reactions

and there seem to be other resources on the web.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top