So the obvious guess is 1999 or 2006.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation A2 = (4/5)(18292 + 12982) without a calculator during a timed competition. Participants share methods for simplifying the calculation, including algebraic manipulation and modular arithmetic to narrow down potential answers. The correct answer, 2006, is confirmed through various approaches, including factoring and estimating logarithms. Suggestions for improving speed in arithmetic calculations are also provided, emphasizing the importance of practice and shortcuts. The conversation highlights the challenge of performing complex calculations quickly under pressure.
ephedyn
Messages
169
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Find A:

A2 = (4/5)(18292 + 12982)

in about 3min, because this comes at the end of a rather difficult geometry problem with 6 min for the entire question. (edit: Yes, calculators weren't allowed because it was a competition. I have verified that everyone comes to this step, so I didn't make any mistakes before that.)

Homework Equations



None.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm quite sure there's some algebraic manipulation to help you with this one, but I can't think of it. I did the 18292 and 12982 the 'brute force' way, then added them together for the sum. This step took the longest - more than 3min for me.

Then I converted this to standard form so as to mentally estimate the common logarithm to 3 decimal points. I also know common lg 4 and lg 5 by memory to 3 decimal points - then I took a 'guess' at A:

lg A = (lg 4 + lg(18292+12982) - lg 5)/2

Comes around to 2 * 103~ rather quickly, correct a bit and 'try' a few values, and I found 2006 eventually (edit: , which is the correct answer.)

Also did think of putting it in (1829+1298)2 - 2*1829*1298, but it still takes about as long. Alternatively, I had a suggestion to use 18002 + 292 + 2*1800*29, and similar for 12002 + 982 + 2*1200*98, which takes about as long for me.

Does anyone see an algebraic manipulation to make this easier? Thanks in advance ;)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not really algebraic manipulation -- just factoring.
A2 = 4/5[18292 + 12982]
= 4/5[592 * 312 + 542 * 112 * 22]
= 4/5[592(312 + 112 * 4)]
= 4/5[592(961 + 484)]
= 4/5[592(1445)] = 4/5[592 * (5 * 289)]
= 4[592 * 172]

==> A = 2*59*17 = 2006
 
Oh, I didn't see 59^2 and 17^2 (don't come across these primes often)! Thanks very much. I wish you a good weekend.
 
Would 1829=1830-1 be useful?
 
What was the problem? Working it differently might have lead to something with simpler arithmetic at the end.


If you're really serious about speed arithmetic, then you might want to practice multiplication; you should be able to compute (4/5)(1829^2 + 1298^2) in under three minutes the direct way... and even faster with shortcuts (e.g. computing 1830^2 and 1300^2 first, and adjusting to get the correct answer)


Also, I assume you're practicing from three-year old problems? It is common to have problems involve the year somehow -- so if you know there's an answer around 2000, the very first thing you should guess is the year. :smile: Maybe even memorize other interesting things -- such as its prime factorization.


You can use modular arithmetic to pick the answer out of a narrow range. e.g.

A^2 = (4/5)(1829^2 + 1298^2) = (4*2) (2^2 + 2^2) = 8*8 = 1 (mod 9)
A = 1 or 8 (mod 9)

A^2 = (4/5)(1829^2 + 1298^2) = (4*3) (2^2 + 3^2) = 5 * 6 = 2 (mod 7)
A = 3 or 4 (mod 7)

Based on the modulo 9 criterion, the possibilties nearest 2000 are
..., 1990, 1997, 1999, 2006, 2008, ...

And modulo 7, they are
..., 1991, 1992, 1998, 1999, 2005, 2006, ...
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top