I Solar chromosphere: inter-conversion of Ca I, Ca II, role of photons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conversion of ionized calcium (Ca II) to non-ionized calcium (Ca I) in the solar chromosphere and the role of photons in this process. It is noted that atomic collisions at chromospheric temperatures can provide enough energy to eject an electron from Ca I, forming Ca II, without necessarily requiring a 393.37 nm photon for this transition. The question arises whether the absorption of a 393.37 nm photon is needed to elevate the electron to a higher orbital before it can be knocked out, or if collisions can directly free the electron from the lower orbital. Additionally, the presence of background 393.37 nm photons due to Black Body radiation is considered, suggesting that Ca II emissions might occur alongside a lower concentration of these photons. The conclusion drawn is that the generation of the Ca K emission line is not directly linked to the transition of the electron being ejected from the valence shell.
jordankonisky
Messages
41
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Does the mechanism of the formation of solar Ca I to Ca II require photons? What is the level of 393.37 nm photons in the solar chromosphere? Using Ca II filter to image solar Ca.
My question relates to the physics of the emission line of Ca II which originates in the solar chromosphere. My understanding is that ionized Ca which lacks a single electron in its valence orbital interacts with free electron in the chromosphere milieu to form Ca I (nonionized). The captured electron then moves from its capture orbital (4P 3/2) to the 4S 1/2 orbital and in the process generates a photon of lambda = 393.37 nm. This photon then travels to my telescope with a Ca II-K filter and then to my imaging camera.

My question is what is the mechanism by which that nonionized Ca I is converted to ionized Ca II. I have read that at the temperature of the chromosphere there is sufficient energy produced through atomic collisions to knock an electron out of the Ca I valence orbit to produce Ca II and a free electron. My question: does a photon of 393.37 nm play any role in the production of Ca II? Is it required that the leaving electron be kicked up to its capture orbital (4P 3/2) via absorption of a 393.37 nm photon before a collision can knock the electron out of Ca I to produce Ca II? Or can the collision free an electron from Ca I directly out of 4S ½ without the intervention of a 393.37 nm photon?

Finally, if there were no Ca in the chromosphere, wouldn’t there be some background of some 393.37 nm photons via the Black Body radiation profile? So, what I image are Ca II photons over a much lower concentration of free 393.37 nm photons. Hope I’m thinking about this right.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
jordankonisky said:
Summary:: Does the mechanism of the formation of solar Ca I to Ca II require photons? What is the level of 393.37 nm photons in the solar chromosphere? Using Ca II filter to image solar Ca.

My question relates to the physics of the emission line of Ca II which originates in the solar chromosphere. My understanding is that ionized Ca which lacks a single electron in its valence orbital interacts with free electron in the chromosphere milieu to form Ca I (nonionized). The captured electron then moves from its capture orbital (4P 3/2) to the 4S 1/2 orbital and in the process generates a photon of lambda = 393.37 nm. This photon then travels to my telescope with a Ca II-K filter and then to my imaging camera.

My question is what is the mechanism by which that nonionized Ca I is converted to ionized Ca II. I have read that at the temperature of the chromosphere there is sufficient energy produced through atomic collisions to knock an electron out of the Ca I valence orbit to produce Ca II and a free electron. My question: does a photon of 393.37 nm play any role in the production of Ca II? Is it required that the leaving electron be kicked up to its capture orbital (4P 3/2) via absorption of a 393.37 nm photon before a collision can knock the electron out of Ca I to produce Ca II? Or can the collision free an electron from Ca I directly out of 4S ½ without the intervention of a 393.37 nm photon?

Finally, if there were no Ca in the chromosphere, wouldn’t there be some background of some 393.37 nm photons via the Black Body radiation profile? So, what I image are Ca II photons over a much lower concentration of free 393.37 nm photons. Hope I’m thinking about this right.
 
I figured this out myself It is not the transition of the electron per se that is knocked out of the valence shell that generates the Ca K emission line.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...
Back
Top