I Solar chromosphere: inter-conversion of Ca I, Ca II, role of photons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conversion of ionized calcium (Ca II) to non-ionized calcium (Ca I) in the solar chromosphere and the role of photons in this process. It is noted that atomic collisions at chromospheric temperatures can provide enough energy to eject an electron from Ca I, forming Ca II, without necessarily requiring a 393.37 nm photon for this transition. The question arises whether the absorption of a 393.37 nm photon is needed to elevate the electron to a higher orbital before it can be knocked out, or if collisions can directly free the electron from the lower orbital. Additionally, the presence of background 393.37 nm photons due to Black Body radiation is considered, suggesting that Ca II emissions might occur alongside a lower concentration of these photons. The conclusion drawn is that the generation of the Ca K emission line is not directly linked to the transition of the electron being ejected from the valence shell.
jordankonisky
Messages
41
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Does the mechanism of the formation of solar Ca I to Ca II require photons? What is the level of 393.37 nm photons in the solar chromosphere? Using Ca II filter to image solar Ca.
My question relates to the physics of the emission line of Ca II which originates in the solar chromosphere. My understanding is that ionized Ca which lacks a single electron in its valence orbital interacts with free electron in the chromosphere milieu to form Ca I (nonionized). The captured electron then moves from its capture orbital (4P 3/2) to the 4S 1/2 orbital and in the process generates a photon of lambda = 393.37 nm. This photon then travels to my telescope with a Ca II-K filter and then to my imaging camera.

My question is what is the mechanism by which that nonionized Ca I is converted to ionized Ca II. I have read that at the temperature of the chromosphere there is sufficient energy produced through atomic collisions to knock an electron out of the Ca I valence orbit to produce Ca II and a free electron. My question: does a photon of 393.37 nm play any role in the production of Ca II? Is it required that the leaving electron be kicked up to its capture orbital (4P 3/2) via absorption of a 393.37 nm photon before a collision can knock the electron out of Ca I to produce Ca II? Or can the collision free an electron from Ca I directly out of 4S ½ without the intervention of a 393.37 nm photon?

Finally, if there were no Ca in the chromosphere, wouldn’t there be some background of some 393.37 nm photons via the Black Body radiation profile? So, what I image are Ca II photons over a much lower concentration of free 393.37 nm photons. Hope I’m thinking about this right.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
jordankonisky said:
Summary:: Does the mechanism of the formation of solar Ca I to Ca II require photons? What is the level of 393.37 nm photons in the solar chromosphere? Using Ca II filter to image solar Ca.

My question relates to the physics of the emission line of Ca II which originates in the solar chromosphere. My understanding is that ionized Ca which lacks a single electron in its valence orbital interacts with free electron in the chromosphere milieu to form Ca I (nonionized). The captured electron then moves from its capture orbital (4P 3/2) to the 4S 1/2 orbital and in the process generates a photon of lambda = 393.37 nm. This photon then travels to my telescope with a Ca II-K filter and then to my imaging camera.

My question is what is the mechanism by which that nonionized Ca I is converted to ionized Ca II. I have read that at the temperature of the chromosphere there is sufficient energy produced through atomic collisions to knock an electron out of the Ca I valence orbit to produce Ca II and a free electron. My question: does a photon of 393.37 nm play any role in the production of Ca II? Is it required that the leaving electron be kicked up to its capture orbital (4P 3/2) via absorption of a 393.37 nm photon before a collision can knock the electron out of Ca I to produce Ca II? Or can the collision free an electron from Ca I directly out of 4S ½ without the intervention of a 393.37 nm photon?

Finally, if there were no Ca in the chromosphere, wouldn’t there be some background of some 393.37 nm photons via the Black Body radiation profile? So, what I image are Ca II photons over a much lower concentration of free 393.37 nm photons. Hope I’m thinking about this right.
 
I figured this out myself It is not the transition of the electron per se that is knocked out of the valence shell that generates the Ca K emission line.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top