Solid Elasticity, Steel Rod shortening

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the shortening of a steel rod under its own weight when positioned vertically. The problem involves concepts from solid elasticity, specifically relating to Young's modulus and longitudinal deformation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the shortening of the rod using the weight of the rod and its dimensions, questioning the relevance of the radius in their calculations. Some participants discuss the non-constant nature of stress along the length of the rod and how this affects the overall deformation.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of varying stress along the rod and are engaging in mathematical reasoning to refine their understanding of the problem. There is acknowledgment of the complexity involved in integrating the forces and stresses, with some guidance provided on the correct approach to the calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted complexity in the integration process and the understanding of local stress and strain, which some participants are still grappling with. The discussion reflects a learning environment where assumptions about uniformity in stress are being questioned.

Siune
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have a steel rod with density ρ = 7,90 kg/m^3. When it's horizontally on the floor, it's length is L = 6,00m. The rods surface area A is a circle with radius r=0,04m. Steel has Young modulus E=2,1 \cdot 10^{11}

Now the rod is lifted up so it's vertically straight. How much does the rod shorten \Delta L = ? under it's own weight.


Homework Equations


Longitudinal deformation: \frac{F}{A} = E \frac{\Delta L}{L}

The Attempt at a Solution


Problem is easy I assume. I'm not just sure is the force that causes the shortening F= Mg where M=ρ\pi r^2 L

I was thinking that we have infinitely small disc(s) with area A and height dL. Now each disc would feel a force due to it's weight dm \cdot g.
And now intergrating through the whole rod (From 0 to L) we would get
∫dm \cdot g = ∫ (ρ \pi r^2 g) dL = ρ\pi r^2 g L = Mg

Now we get \Delta L = \frac{FL}{AE} = \frac{ρgL^2}{E} = 1,33 \cdot 10^-5 m.
So the shortening would be independent of the area which I hugely doubt? Especially as we are given the radius. And our teacher has never put "too much info" in the description to trick us. If anyone could expain it with words or thru math I would really appericate it.

Sincerely yours,
Siune
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is basically correct (the radius is not relevant), except for one thing. The strain in the bar is not constant from end to end. The stress and strain in the bar are zero at the top, and are maximum at the bottom (where the entire weight is supported). On average, the stress is only half the weight divided by the area. Therefore, the change in length is only half of what you calculated.
 
Okey, that makes sense. I mean I can understand it through symmetry that F is not constant and the \Delta L is half. But mathematically, is it right like this:

\Delta L = ∫\frac{L}{AE}dF = ∫\frac{L}{\pi r^2E}gρ\pi r^2 dL = ∫\frac{ρg}{E} L dL = \frac{ρgL^2}{2E}

I'm really sorry, my understanding of intergrating could be better but I try to improve!
 
Siune said:
Okey, that makes sense. I mean I can understand it through symmetry that F is not constant and the \Delta L is half. But mathematically, is it right like this:

\Delta L = ∫\frac{L}{AE}dF = ∫\frac{L}{\pi r^2E}gρ\pi r^2 dL = ∫\frac{ρg}{E} L dL = \frac{ρgL^2}{2E}

I'm really sorry, my understanding of intergrating could be better but I try to improve!

The local compressive stress is ρgL, where L is distance measured downward. The local compressive strain is ε =ρgL/E. The local differential of compressed length is (1 - e)dL. The local differential length shortening is εdL = (ρgL/E)dL. This agrees with the last part of your equation. So your overall final equation is correct.
 
Thank you Chestermiller. That local stress were "new concept" for me, but makes sense.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K