Solid State Devices: Harnessing Heat to Create Electrical Energy

AI Thread Summary
Solid state devices, specifically Peltier junctions, can convert temperature differences into electrical energy, utilizing the Seebeck effect. These devices consist of two metal plates with a thermoelectric material sandwiched between them, generating current when one side is heated and the other remains cooler. The discussion highlights the ease of energy extraction from thermal imbalances, aligning with the second law of thermodynamics. For further understanding, resources like Wikipedia provide detailed explanations of the thermoelectric effect. This technology exemplifies how heat can be harnessed for electrical energy generation without any moving parts.
Larbear
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Last summer I spent a few days at RIT taking some seminars on engineering and what different courses would be like, one of the professors was demonstrating some of the materials we would get to use and he produced a an object consiting of two metal plates sandwiching some other sort of material with two wires leading out of it. He then demonstrated that if you apply heat to one side and a relativly colder object to the other, you could get a current running through the wires. He called this a solid state device because it had no moving parts inside.

I understand that it is easy to get energy from an imbalance such as the temperature imbalance between the plates (I believe that's the 2nd law of thermodynamics). But if someone could explain the innerworkings of this device like how it turns the heat into electrical energy, or any other information on these devices, that would be most appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It is a peltier junction. I'm sure you can find all kinds of info if you google it and perhaps check wiki.
 
Look up the thermoelectric effect and more specifically, the Seebeck effect.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top