Solid State Physics: Charles Kittel vs. Ashcroft

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the suitability of textbooks for an undergraduate course in Introductory Solid State Physics. The student expresses concern over the negative reviews of Charles Kittel's book, which is assigned by the instructor, and is considering Ashcroft's book, which has received positive feedback. Key points include inquiries about the similarities in content between Kittel and Ashcroft's books, and whether Ashcroft's book is appropriate for beginners in solid state physics. Additionally, a recommendation is made for Dekker's book, noted for its effectiveness for both undergraduate and graduate students, suggesting it may be a better option for novices in the subject.
SANGHERA.JAS
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I am an undergraduate student and this year I am going to study Introductory Solid State Physics. My instructor has assigned us book of Charles Kittel. But the book has got terrible reviews on amazon. So I fear purchasing it. However there is an another book by Ashcroft that has got pretty good reviews. My question is:
1. Are these two books similar that is do they cover same material.
2. As I am totally novice in solid state physics, are these books especially Ashcroft's book, suitable for me. (I have sufficient background).
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for solid state physics prefer dekker it is so good for the beginner
 
sanghera.jas said:
hello everyone,
i am an undergraduate student and this year i am going to study introductory solid state physics. My instructor has assigned us book of charles kittel. But the book has got terrible reviews on amazon. So i fear purchasing it. However there is an another book by ashcroft that has got pretty good reviews. My question is:
1. Are these two books similar that is do they cover same material.
2. As i am totally novice in solid state physics, are these books especially ashcroft's book, suitable for me. (i have sufficient background).
Thank you.

hai i would suggest you solid state physics by dekker it is so good for under graduate students as well as graduate students.
 
physicsdoubts said:
for solid state physics prefer dekker it is so good for the beginner
Thank you.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
180
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top