Solid state physics, exercise about reciprocal lattice

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


Hi guys, I don't reach the correct answer to an exercise. I'm following Ashcroft's book.
I must find that the reciprocal of the bcc Bravais lattice is a fcc one and the reciprocal of the fcc Bravais lattice is a bcc one.


Homework Equations



If a_1, a_2 and a_3 are vectors spaning the Bravais lattice, then the reciprocal lattice is spanned by the vectors b_1= 2 \pi \frac{a_2 \times a_3}{a_1 \cdot (a_2 \times a_3)}, b_2= 2 \pi \frac{a_3 \times a_1}{a_1 \cdot (a_2 \times a_3)} and b_3= 2 \pi \frac{a_1 \times a_2}{a_1 \cdot (a_2 \times a_3)}

The Attempt at a Solution


For a bcc lattice: a_1=\frac{a}{2}(\hat y +\hat z-\hat x ), a_2=\frac{a}{2}(\hat z +\hat x-\hat y ) and a_3=\frac{a}{2}(\hat x +\hat y-\hat z ).
While for a fcc lattice, a_1=\frac{a}{2}(\hat y +\hat z), a_2=\frac{a}{2}(\hat z +\hat x ) and a_3=\frac{a}{2}(\hat y +\hat x ).
I first tried to show that the reciprocal of the fcc lattice is a bcc lattice. So I just used the formulae given but didn't reach what I should have.
b_1=2\pi \frac{[ \frac{a}{2}(\hat z + \hat x )] \times [ \frac{a}{2} (\hat x + \hat y ) ]}{[\frac{a}{2} (\hat y + \hat x )] \cdot [ \frac{a}{2} (\hat z + \hat x ) \times \frac{a}{2} (\hat x + \hat y ) ] }.
I calculated (\hat z + \hat x ) \times (\hat x + \hat y ) to be worth \hat y + \hat z. So that I reached that b_1=\frac{4 \pi }{a} (\hat y + \hat z ). This is already wrong, according to the book I should have reached b_1=\frac{4 \pi }{a} \cdot \frac{1}{2} (\hat y + \hat z -\hat x ).
I have no clue on what I've done wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
z times x = y
z times y = -x
x times x = 0
x times y = z
 
M Quack said:
z times x = y
z times y = -x
x times x = 0
x times y = z

Ok thanks. I see that I made a mistake in doing that cross product (I did it via a determinant and did the arithmetics too fast, forgetting a term).
I now reach that (\hat z +\hat x) \times (\hat x +\hat y)=\hat y +\hat z -\hat x. But now the denominator is worth (\hat y +\hat x )\cdot (\hat y + \hat z -\hat x )=1-1=0 which can't be right.
 
fluidistic said:
I now reach that (\hat z +\hat x) \times (\hat x +\hat y)=\hat y +\hat z -\hat x. But now the denominator is worth (\hat y +\hat x )\cdot (\hat y + \hat z -\hat x )=1-1=0 which can't be right.

The denominator should be

(\hat y +\hat z )\cdot (\hat y + \hat z -\hat x )

ehild
 
ehild said:
The denominator should be

(\hat y +\hat z )\cdot (\hat y + \hat z -\hat x )

ehild

Ok thanks! That made it, I now reach what I should.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top